Reducing Functional Domain of Histatin 5 Improves Antifungal Activity and Prevents Proteolytic Degradation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Histatin 5 (Hst5) is an antifungal peptide (AFP) naturally produced by parotid glands with strong activity against Candida albicans. One of its mechanisms of action is the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) inside the C. albicans cells. Despite being an important peptide for the human innate immune response, its activity is reduced or inactivated by proteolytic degradation caused by salivary enzymes. To overcome this barrier, we used solid phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) to modify the Hst5 amino acid sequence improving its antifungal action and minimizing its degradation. We synthesized five peptides, three of which were based on the Hst5 functional domain. We determined that the smallest peptides (8WH5, 7WH5 and 6WH5) demonstrated the greatest antifungal action against C. albicans, including one fluconazole-resistant strain. Besides that, cationic-PAGE and HPLC assays showed that the degradation in saliva was slower for the smaller peptides than for 0WHst5 and WP113. Furthermore, 8WH5, 7WH5 and 6WH5 were found in the samples even after 8 h in whole saliva, while 0WHst5 and WP113 completely disappear after 1.5 h. Finally, we found that the smaller peptides were less fragmented than the 0WHst5 and WP113, so they were the smallest fragments of Hst5 to preserve its antifungal action with reduced degradation in whole saliva. Thus, they can be considered promising molecules for the treatment of C. albicans in the oral cavity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".