An intentional hybridity towards <i>modus vivendi</i> : the Chinese translation of <i>the Admirable Crichton</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article examines Yu Shangyuan’s 1929 Chinese translation of J. M. Barrie’s The Admirable Crichton through the lens of Mikhail Bakhtin theory of hybridity, arguing that Yu’s strategic blending of vernacular and archaic Chinese constitutes an “intentional hybridity.” Positioned within the aftermath of China’s National Theatre Movement, which sought to integrate traditional operatic aesthetics into modern drama but faced vehement opposition, Yu’s translation emerges as a tactical “modus vivendi.” By embedding classical idioms and four-character poetic constructions within stage directions while retaining colloquial dialogue, Yu navigated the era’s ideological tensions between Western modernity and Chinese tradition. This linguistic duality allowed him to covertly revive traditional aesthetics under the guise of translating a Western play, thereby avoiding the backlash that had dismantled his earlier advocacy. Contributing to modern Chinese theatre historiography, the article underscores Bakhtin’s hybridity theory as a vital tool for analysing translation’s socio-cultural agency, particularly in contexts where resistance operates through textual negotiation rather than overt confrontation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".