MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410426235 · doi:10.1101/2025.05.15.25327709

Free water predicts dementia with Lewy bodies in isolated REM sleep behavior disorder

2025· preprint· en· W4410426235 on OpenAlexafffund
Celine Haddad, Véronique Daneault, Violette Ayral, Marie Filiatrault, Alexandre Pastor‐Bernier, Christina Tremblay, Arnaud Boré, Maxime Descoteaux, Andrew Vo, Jean‐François Gagnon, Ronald B. Postuma, Petr Dušek, Stanislav Mareček, Zsóka Varga, Johannes Klein, Stéphane Lehéricy, Isabelle Arnulf, Marie Vidailhet, Jean‐Christophe Corvol

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité de SherbrookeCanadian Sleep & Circadian Network
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAvid RadiopharmaceuticalsAllerganNational Institutes of HealthAgentura Pro Zdravotnický Výzkum České RepublikyEuropean CommissionMinisterstvo Školství, Mládeže a TělovýchovyParkinson's UKNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchBiogenCelgeneAbbVieBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsREM sleep behavior disorderDementia with Lewy bodiesDementiaSleep (system call)NeurosciencePsychologyMedicineAudiologyInternal medicinePolysomnographyElectroencephalographyComputer scienceDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Structured Abstract INTRODUCTION Most individuals with isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) develop dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) or Parkinson’s disease (PD). Brain biomarkers predicting specific phenoconversion trajectories are lacking. METHODS In this multicenter diffusion MRI study (261 iRBD, 177 controls), free water (FW) was measured in the nucleus basalis of Meynert (NBM) and posterior substantia nigra (SN). Among 230 iRBD patients with follow-up, 64 converted (16 DLB, 38 PD). Time-to-event analyses were performed to assess differential phenoconversion. RESULTS Phenoconverters had higher FW in the NBM and posterior SN. Only FW in the NBM predicted conversion to DLB over PD. NBM volume predicted DLB conversion, but only FW remained significant when both were modeled. FW in the NBM correlated with lower MoCA scores in iRBD. DISCUSSION FW in the NBM is a sensitive biomarker of cognitive decline and DLB progression in iRBD, outperforming volume and supporting its use in early stratification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicSleep and Wakefulness Research→French-language works237,207→