MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410504118 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsaf090.0843

0843 ENCORE: Topline Results of a Phase 3 Open-Label Extension and Randomized-Withdrawal Trial of AXS-12 in Narcolepsy

2025· article· en· W4410504118 on OpenAlexaff
Richard Bogan, Michael J. Thorpy, Lois E. Krahn, Bruce Corser, Colin M. Shapiro, Angad Chhabra, Eileen Leary, Herriot Tabuteau

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Western Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarcolepsyOpen labelRandomized controlled trialMedicinePsychiatryInternal medicineModafinil

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction AXS-12 (reboxetine) is a highly selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor and cortical dopamine modulator under development for narcolepsy. In the Phase 3 SYMPHONY trial, AXS-12 significantly reduced weekly cataplexy attacks from baseline to Week 5 versus placebo in patients with narcolepsy. Here we report the Phase 3 ENCORE trial, assessing long-term efficacy and safety of AXS-12 in participants who completed SYMPHONY. Methods ENCORE included a 24-week open-label extension (OLE) period, followed by a 3-week double-blind randomized-withdrawal (DBRW) period. During the OLE, participants received AXS-12 (5 mg once-daily for 1 week, twice-daily for 23 weeks). Following this, remaining participants were randomized 1:1 to continue twice-daily AXS-12 or switch to once-daily AXS-12 plus placebo for 1 week, then placebo twice-daily for 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in frequency of cataplexy attacks from randomization to DBRW Week 3. OLE efficacy outcomes included change in weekly frequency of cataplexy attacks, cataplexy response (≥50% reduction), and change in cataplexy-free days. Additional analyses are ongoing. Results ENCORE enrolled 68 participants; 42 completed the OLE and entered the DBRW (AXS-12, n=22; placebo, n=20). In SYMPHONY, baseline mean weekly frequency of cataplexy attacks was 31.5. At DBRW randomization, mean weekly frequency of cataplexy attacks was 4.2 (AXS-12) and 6.9 (placebo). Participants randomized to placebo experienced a mean increase of 10.29 weekly cataplexy attacks versus 1.32 for AXS-12, at end of DBRW (p=0.017). In the OLE, weekly frequency of cataplexy attacks decreased by 22.3 (71%) and 24.1 (77%) at 1 and 6 months, respectively. Cataplexy response was achieved by 72% and 82% at 1 and 6 months, respectively. Cataplexy-free days increased from 14.3% to 61% and 70% at 1 and 6 months, respectively. Common adverse events (AEs; ≥5%) during the OLE were nausea and tachycardia (both 5.9%); no new safety signals were detected. Discontinuations due to AEs occurred in 17.6% of participants in the OLE. Conclusion AXS-12 significantly reduced the frequency of cataplexy attacks during the DBRW. AXS-12 was well-tolerated and demonstrated maintenance of efficacy with long-term open-label use. These results align with SYMPHONY, supporting the positive therapeutic impact of AXS-12 for narcolepsy. Support (if any) Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicSleep and Wakefulness ResearchFrench-language works237,207