MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410513227 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.2025-0390.o012

ACHIEVEMENT OF PROTEINURIA LESS THAN 0.4 G/G IN THE PHASE 3 AURORA 1 STUDY OF VOCLOSPORIN IN LUPUS NEPHRITIS

2025· article· en· W4410513227 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Maria Dall’Era, Brad H. Rovin, Salem Almaani, Vanessa Birardi, Ernie Yap

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsAurinia (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLupus nephritisProteinuriaNephritisInternal medicineImmunologyKidneyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O012 / #232 Topic: AS15 - Lupus Nephritis-Clinical ABSTRACT CONCURRENT SESSION 01: FINDINGS FROM LUPUS CLINICAL TRIALS 22-05-2025 1:40 PM - 2:40 PM Background/Purpose Reduction in urine protein creatine ratio (UPCR) is the cornerstone of the definition of treatment response in lupus nephritis. Treatment guidelines have incorporated various UPCR targets as goals of therapy, with UPCR <0.5 g/g being at the lower end.[1,2] However, studies demonstrate that low-grade proteinuria, even <0.5 g/g, is often associated with significant histologic activity.[3] Therefore, targeting lower UPCR levels may be beneficial to patients. Using data from the 52-week, Phase 3 AURORA 1 study in lupus nephritis, this post hoc analysis assessed achievement of UPCR targets <0.4 g/g with a voclosporin-based therapy. Methods Key inclusion criteria for the AURORA 1 study included biopsy-proven active LN, UPCR ≥1.5 g/g (≥2 g/g for class V) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ). Participants were randomized to either voclosporin (23.7 mg) or matching placebo (control) twice daily, in combination with MMF (target 2 g/day) and low-dose glucocorticoids (starting dose 20-25 mg/day, tapered to ≤2.5 mg/day by Week 16). Achievement at any study visit of UPCR targets <0.4 g/g, <0.3 g/g, <0.2 g/g, and <0.1 g/g was assessed. Baseline demographics, disease characteristics and safety outcomes are described for the subgroup of participants with UPCR <0.4 g/g at any study visit. Results Of the 357 participants in AURORA 1, 109 (60.9%) voclosporin-treated participants and 66 (37.1%) control-treated participants achieved a UPCR <0.4 g/g at least once during the 52-week study (Table 1). Of these 175 participants with UPCR <0.4 g/g, 87% were female, and mean (SD) age was 34 (11.2) years. A total of 13% had class III lupus nephritis, 49% had class IV, 16% had class V, and 40% had mixed disease. The median (range) time since diagnosis of lupus nephritis was 1.1 (0-27.0) years. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar between the 2 treatment groups (voclosporin, 89.9%; control, 83.3%). Mean eGFR remained stable and within the normal range in both groups (Figure 1). Table 1. Proteinuria Reductions Achieved in AURORA 1 Figure 1. Mean Corrected eGFR in Participants Achieving UPCR <0.4 g/g Conclusions Nearly half of the AURORA 1 population achieved a UPCR <0.4 g/g at least once during the 52-week study. Participants treated with voclosporin achieved lower UPCR targets at substantially higher rates than control-treated participants, with comparable rates of adverse events. These data provide initial evidence that targeting lower UPCR targets is feasible and enhanced with the use of voclosporin-based therapy. References: [1.] Rovin BH. Kidney Int 2024;105(1):31-4. [2.] Fanouriakis A. Ann Rheum Dis 2024;83(1):15-29. [3.] De Rosa M. Kidney Int Rep 2020;5(7):1066-8.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research→French-language works237,207→