Lytic Transglycosylase Deficiency Increases Susceptibility to β‐lactam Antibiotics But Reduces Susceptibility to Vancomycin in <i>Escherichia coli</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Staphylococcus aureus, a gram-positive pathogen, vancomycin-resistant strains become susceptible to β-lactam antibiotics, referred to as the "seesaw effect." However, in gram-negative bacteria, the phenomenon is less clear. Here, we analyzed the gene-knockout effects of eight lytic transglycosylases (slt, mltA, mltB, mltC, mltD, mltE, mltF, mltG) on antibiotic sensitivity in Escherichia coli. Knockout of both slt and mltG increased sensitivity to β-lactam antibiotics and reduced sensitivity to vancomycin. The β-lactam antibiotic sensitivity and vancomycin resistance of the slt-knockout mutant were abolished by the introduction of the wild-type slt gene but remained unchanged by the introduction of the mutant slt gene encoding an amino acid substitution variant of the transglycosylase catalytic centre. The double-knockout strain for slt and mltB was more sensitive to ampicillin and more resistant to vancomycin than each single-knockout strain. The double-knockout strain for slt and mltG was more sensitive to ampicillin and more resistant to vancomycin than each single-knockout strain. These results suggest that loss of lytic transglycosylase activity causes β-lactam antibiotic sensitivity and vancomycin resistance in E. coli.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".