MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

KEYMAKER-U01E: A phase 2 umbrella study with rolling arms of investigational agents with or without chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab for resectable stage II–IIIB (N2) non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2025· article· en· W4410815858 on OpenAlexaff
Konstantin H. Dragnev, Mustafa Erman, Emilio Bria, Jay M. Lee, Cole Manschot, Jeffrey Thompson, Ayman Samkari, Jonathan Spicer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePembrolizumabChemotherapyLung cancerStage (stratigraphy)Phases of clinical researchOncologynon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)CancerInternal medicineSurgeryImmunotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS8115 Background: Neoadjuvantpembrolizumab (pembro) + chemotherapy (CT) followed by adjuvant pembro significantly improved event-free survival (EFS), pathological complete response (pCR), major pathological response, and overall survival (OS) in early-stage NSCLC. Despite the expanding number of therapeutic options for early-stage NSCLC, there remains an unmet need to improve outcomes. Sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT/MK-2870/SKB264) is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti-trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 antibody, a hydrolytically cleavable linker, and a belotecan-derivative topoisomerase I inhibitor payload (average drug-to-antibody ratio, 7.4). Sac-TMT monotherapy demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity in a phase 1/2 study in heavily pretreated, advanced NSCLC. The phase 2 KEYMAKER-U01E study (NCT06788912) is evaluating the addition of multiple investigational agents ± CT to pembro followed by surgery and adjuvant pembro in resectable stage II–IIIB (N2) NSCLC; the treatment arm presented here includes sac-TMT + pembro. Methods: This open-label, adaptive design study is enrolling participants (pts) aged ≥18 years with previously untreated, pathologically confirmed, resectable stage II, IIIA, or IIIB (N2) NSCLC (AJCC v8) with no EGFR mutations, and measurable disease per RECIST v1.1. Pts must be able to undergo surgery, have ECOG PS 0 or 1, and provide a tumor sample for biomarker analysis. Approximately 60 pts will be randomized 1:1 to Arm 1 or 2. In Arm 1 (reference arm), pts will receive neoadjuvant therapy of 4 cycles of pembro 200 mg intravenously (IV) + CT IV Q3W (cisplatin 75 mg/m 2 or carboplatin area under the curve 5 or 6 mg/mL/min on day 1 with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8 for squamous histology, with pemetrexed 500 mg/m 2 on day 1 for nonsquamous, or with paclitaxel 175 or 200 mg/m 2 on day 1 for any histology). Pts in Arm 2 will receive 4 cycles of pembro 200 mg IV Q3W + 6 cycles of sac-TMT 4 mg/kg IV Q2W (treatment arm). Following surgery, all pts will receive up to 13 cycles of adjuvant pembro 200 mg IV Q3W. Additional agents may be included when available. Randomization will be stratified by histology (squamous vs nonsquamous) and tumor stage (II vs III). Dual primary endpoints are pCR (ypT0/ypN0) and percentage of residual viable tumor, assessed by blinded independent pathology review. Secondary endpoints are EFS and distant metastasis-free survival per investigator review, OS, objective response rate during neoadjuvant therapy, and safety. Postoperative tumor imaging occurs ≤4 weeks before the start of adjuvant therapy, with pts followed per study protocol until disease recurrence, development of new primary NSCLC, pregnancy, death, pt withdrawal, or end of study. AEs will be graded per NCI CTCAE v5.0. Enrollment is scheduled to begin in March 2025 at 34 sites globally. Clinical trial information: NCT06788912 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.529
Teacher spread0.421 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations→French-language works237,207→