Mechanistic insights and antifungal assessment of (3+2) cycloaddition products of 2-diazopropane and 5-hydroxy-3-methyl-1,5-dihydropyrrol-2-one derivatives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The (3+2) cycloaddition reactions of 2-diazopropane with derivatives of 5-hydroxy-3-methyl-1,5-dihydropyrrol-2-one were investigated using Molecular Electron Density Theory. Calculations were performed at the wB97XD/6-311++G(d,p) level of theory. Conceptual Density Functional Theory indices revealed a low polar character for these reactions, supported by a minimal global electron density transfer at the transition structures, which were classified as forward electron density flux processes. The Electron Localization Function analysis identified 2-diazopropane as a pseudo(mono)radical three-atom component. It further indicated that bond formation does not start at the transition structures. Mechanistically, these reactions proceed via an asynchronous one-step mechanism, ultimately leading to products that are kinetically favored. Furthermore, molecular docking studies were conducted to evaluate the antifungal potential of the reaction products against pathogenic fungal strains, Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus. The docking analysis assessed binding affinities and characterized molecular interactions between the proposed compounds and critical fungal proteins, highlighting their potential as antifungal agents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".