MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410940120 · doi:10.1186/s12894-025-01824-5

CpG dinucleotide methylation of the SPDEF gene as a blood-based epigenetic biomarker for prostate cancer diagnosis

2025· article· en· W4410940120 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mohammad Vahid Ahmadianpour, Ahmad Aleyasin

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Urology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of GeneticsNational Institute for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
KeywordsMedicineProstate cancerEpigeneticsCpG siteDNA methylationBiomarkerMethylationCancer researchGeneCancerOncologyInternal medicineGeneticsGene expressionBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most commonly diagnosed malignancy in men and is projected to cause approximately 35,250 deaths in 2024. The utility of total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing as a routine screening tool remains controversial due to limited specificity. Therefore, the identification of novel, noninvasive biomarkers is essential for improving early diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate the methylation status of a specific CpG dinucleotide within the SPDEF (SAM-pointed domain-containing ETS transcription factor) gene promoter in blood leukocytes of PCa patients, using benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) samples as a control group. METHODS: Peripheral blood samples were collected from 360 men, including 180 diagnosed with PCa and 180 with BPH. A target CpG dinucleotide (cg11346722) in the SPDEF promoter was selected based on analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data. Methylation levels were assessed using methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme PCR (MSRE-PCR) and quantitative PCR (qPCR). Associations between methylation and clinical parameters-tumor stage (TS), histological grade, and total PSA levels-were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean methylation level at the SPDEF CpG site was significantly lower in PCa patients (hypomethylation: 92 ± 11.76%) compared to BPH controls (15.5 ± 15.12%) (p < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated that SPDEF hypomethylation discriminated PCa from BPH with 98.3% sensitivity and 98.3% specificity at a < 55% methylation cutoff. A significant inverse correlation was observed between SPDEF methylation and both tumor stage (TS) and grade, whereas no correlation was found with total PSA levels. CONCLUSIONS: Hypomethylation of a specific CpG dinucleotide in the SPDEF promoter may serve as a promising noninvasive blood-based biomarker for the early detection and clinical stratification of prostate cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC UrologySame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207