Multidisciplinary consensus on prevention, screening and monitoring of clozapine-associated myocarditis and clozapine rechallenge after myocarditis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clozapine is the antipsychotic of choice for people with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) but is associated with the uncommon but potentially life-threatening adverse effect of myocarditis. However, there are no criteria for diagnosing clozapine-associated myocarditis (CAM) or global guidelines on detection and risk reduction, or for restarting clozapine after CAM. AIMS: To develop criteria for CAM and algorithms for clozapine initiation and clozapine rechallenge after CAM in a multiprofessional consensus process. METHOD: We conducted a systematic literature search for cases of clozapine rechallenge following CAM using the PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases, followed by a multidisciplinary international two-step Delphi consensus process in July and October 2024. The Delphi panel comprised psychiatrists, cardiologists, pharmacists, psychopharmacologists and nurses with expertise on clozapine or myocarditis. RESULTS: Ninety-three clinicians and academics with experience in prescribing clozapine from six continents participated in the Delphi process. A consensus was reached on a definition of CAM according to modified clinical criteria from the European Society of Cardiology for myocarditis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Titration schemes slower than those given in the Summary of Product Characteristics for clozapine were recommended to minimise CAM risk. Minimum and enhanced requirements for screening and monitoring were developed to account for global perspectives and limited resources in certain healthcare systems, and an approach to clozapine rechallenge was elaborated. CONCLUSIONS: This multidisciplinary project represents the first guidance for CAM and will inform clinicians, other caregivers and patients, as well as facilitating the development of national guidelines on CAM prevention, screening and monitoring and rechallenge after an index episode of myocarditis in individuals taking clozapine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".