Impact of Macrotexture and Microtexture on the Skid Resistance of Asphalt Pavement Using Three-Dimensional (3D) Reconstruction and Printing Technology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, the feasibility of using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology to investigate the impact of macrotexture and microtexture on the skid resistance of asphalt pavement was verified. The macrotexture characteristics of the five types of real asphalt mixtures were captured, reconstructed, and printed. The comparison analysis of the skid resistance between the pavement and printed specimens was conducted, and the correlations and contribution proportions of the macrotexture and microtexture on skid resistance were also calculated. Results show that five printed asphalt mixtures present good consistency in the microtexture with a roughness of about 100 nm. The impact of thin water film on the skid resistance is insignificant for real asphalt mixtures, while it is significant for printed mixtures. The printed specimens under dry conditions show a similar British pendulum number (BPN) with the real pavement specimens under wet conditions, while the BPN under wet conditions for printed specimens are much smaller than the real ones but follows a similar variation trend. Mean profile depth (MPD) values of four printed asphalt concrete (AC) mixtures are well linearly correlated with their BPN under dry and wet conditions, especially for wet conditions with the R2 of 0.91. The contribution proportion of macrotexture to the skid resistance is nearly 90% for the dry condition and about 50% for the wet condition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".