MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410977050 · doi:10.1016/j.est.2025.117199

Historical dimensions and directions on energy storage: unique perspectives

2025· article· en· W4410977050 on OpenAlex
Doğan Erdemir, İbrahim Dinçer

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Energy Storage · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ontario Institute of Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitectural engineeringGeographyEconomic geographyEpistemologySociologyComputer scienceData scienceEngineeringPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energy storage has become a crucial technology solution in an era marked by the urgent need to transition towards sustainable energy systems with renewable sources and energy storage systems. It facilitates the widespread adoption of these sources and ensures the reliability and resilience of energy networks. This perspective article offers a comprehensive overview of the current landscape of energy storage technologies, their diverse applications, and the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead, based on bibliographic data captured from the Scopus. The technological landscape of energy storage methods is examined, encompassing mechanical, heat, chemical, electrochemical, magnetic, and electromagnetic as potential short- and long-duration storage techniques. We discuss trend topics related to the diverse applications of energy storage, ranging from grid integration and electric vehicles to microgrids and ancillary services. Additionally, this study highlights critical research directions and technological advancements that can potentially transform the energy storage sector in the years ahead. This study further aims to provide a valuable contribution to the ongoing discussion on achieving a sustainable, reliable, and decarbonized energy future by comprehending the various aspects and predicting the future trends of energy storage. • The critical role of energy storage in the transition to renewable energy sources. • The diverse range of energy storage technologies and their applications. • The need for efficient and scalable energy storage solutions. • The potential of energy storage to enable a sustainable and decarbonized energy future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score0.573

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it