Incident cytopenia and risk of subsequent myeloid neoplasm in age-related clonal hematopoiesis: a multi-biobank case-control study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Cross sectional studies have demonstrated patients with clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) are at increased risk of developing multiple adverse outcomes, including cytopenia and myeloid neoplasm (MN). One prior study suggests cytopenia or cytosis is a required intermediate step in disease progression from CHIP to MN. Methods We analyzed genomic sequencing data from the NIH All of Us Research Program, Vanderbilt's BioVU repository, and UK Biobank participants (N = 805,249). The study period ranged from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2023. Genetic mutations, demographic data, laboratory values, and MN outcomes were used to create a case-control study to estimate the risk of incident cytopenia and MN among cases with CHIP and matched controls without CHIP. Findings After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, the study cohort contained 9374 cases with CHIP and 24,749 matched controls without CHIP. Among the 34,123 participants, 190 (0.56%) developed incident cases of MN and 4151 (12.1%) developed an incident cytopenia. Individuals with CHIP at enrollment who subsequently developed a cytopenia progressed to MN at a rate of 0.5% per year, compared to 0.05% per year for those with CHIP and normal cell counts. Longitudinal analysis across three cohorts demonstrated an increased risk of cytopenia in CHIP patients and identified those at the highest risk of progression. Cytopenia risk factors included smoking (HR = 1.17, 95% CI: [1.05–1.32], P=5.87 × 10 −3 ), male sex (HR = 1.45, 95% CI: [1.30–1.62], P=2.17 × 10 −11 ), variant allele frequency ≥0.20 (HR = 1.36, 95% CI: [1.21–1.54], P=7.56 × 10 −7 ), age ≥65 (HR = 1.41, 95% CI: [1.25–1.57], P=3.98 × 10 −9 ), mean corpuscular volume ≥100 fL (HR = 2.12, 95% CI: [1.68–2.68], P=2.58 × 10 −10 ), red cell distribution width ≥15% (HR = 2.59, 95% CI: [2.26–2.98], P=1.14 × 10 −40 ), mutations in high-risk CHIP genes (HR = 1.48, 95% CI: [1.26–1.75], P=2.39 × 10 −6 ), and ≥2 CHIP mutations (HR = 1.95, 95% CI: [1.61–2.36], P=9.73 × 10 −12 ). Interpretation Longitudinal analysis across three large cohorts found that it is rare for patients with CHIP to develop MN without first developing cytopenia. The risk for MN among patients with CHIP resides almost entirely among those with cytopenia. These findings suggest that cytopenia is a critical step in progression from CHIP to MN, underscoring its utility as an endpoint in cancer prevention trials for CHIP patients. Funding National Institutes of Health, Burroughs Wellcome Fund, Edward P. Evans Foundation, Pew Charitable Trusts, Alexander and Margaret Stewart Trust, Beverly and George Rawlings Directorship.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".