MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411081490 · doi:10.1139/gen-2024-0182

Transcriptome analysis of Brassica napus near-isogenic lines carrying clubroot resistance from turnip (B. rapa var. rapifera)

2025· article· en· W4411081490 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Kawalpreet Kaur, Urmila Basu, Nat N. V. Kav, Habibur Rahman

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Disease Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClubrootBiologyBrassica rapaTranscriptomeBrassicaCanolaGlucosinolateJasmonic acidBrassicaceaePlant disease resistanceGeneGeneticsBotanyGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the intricate molecular interplay between Brassica hosts and the pathogen Plasmodiophora brassicae, causative agent of clubroot disease, is pivotal for devising effective resistance to this disease in Brassica crops. While existing transcriptomic studies have elucidated the host responses to pathogen infection, a comprehensive analysis employing near-isogenic lines (NILs) remains imperative for better understanding of the resistance mechanisms. In this study, we conducted a comparative transcriptome profiling utilizing clubroot-susceptible (CS-NILs) and clubroot-resistant (CR-NILs) near-isogenic Brassica napus lines, carrying the clubroot resistance of turnip (B. rapa var. rapifera), at 7 and 14 days after inoculation. We observed the upregulation of the genes governing phytohormone signaling, receptor kinases, transcription factors, calcium fluxes, and glucosinolate metabolism in the CR-NILs. In addition, the novel differentially expressed genes (DEGs) pertaining to jasmonic acid, calcium signaling, receptor kinases, and glucosinolate biosynthesis were also observed to be differentially expressed. Based on our results, we propose a comprehensive model delineating the molecular events potentially contributing to clubroot resistance in B. napus CR-NILs. Our findings have contributed to an enhanced understanding of the potential mechanisms involved in clubroot resistance which may have utility in targeted breeding initiatives to mitigate the threat of clubroot disease in Brassica crops including canola.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenome→Same topicPlant Disease Resistance and Genetics→French-language works237,207→