An In Vitro Evaluation of the Inhibition of Recombinant Human Carboxylesterase-1 by Herbal Extracts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract INTRODUCTION: Methylphenidate is a psychostimulant prescribed for symptoms of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and is metabolized by carboxylesterase-1 (CES1) enzyme. There is little information on herbal medicine used for ADHD and their interactions with CES1. METHODS: An in vitro study was conducted with extracts of 21 herbal medicines using a recombinant human CES1 enzyme inhibition assay to determine if the extracts influence enzyme activity. Extracts were initially evaluated for their potential to inhibit CES1 metabolism of 4-nitrophenyl acetate using an in vitro Microtiter plate enzyme inhibition assay. The most active extracts were serially diluted to establish the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) and were then tested for potential irreversible inhibition using a time-dependence enzyme assay. Phytochemical characterization of selected extracts was performed, and marker compounds were evaluated for their potential to inhibit CES1-mediated metabolism of the probe substrate. RESULTS: The extracts exhibited a range of inhibition of CES1 activity, ranging from 15-95% at a standard screening concentration of 200 μg/mL. Rhodiola rosea was the most potent inhibitor of CES1 (IC50 = 4.7 μg/mL). No time-dependent inhibitors of CES1 were identified in this study. At 10 μg/mL, marker compounds of ginger, [8]-gingerol (60.3%) and [10]-gingerol (67.2%), showed significant (P < 0.05) inhibition of CES1 compared to vehicle control. DISCUSSION: The herbal medicine extracts showed varying inhibition at supraphysiologic concentrations and no risk of mechanism-based inhibition was observed. Herbal medicine used by ADHD patients have the potential to interact with CES1-mediated metabolism. To mitigate potential risk of herb-drug interactions, patients using herbal medicine alongside CES1-metabolized drugs should discuss their use with healthcare professionals. CONCLUSIONS: In vivo and clinical research are required to determine if the potential interactions would significantly affect safety and efficacy of methylphenidate at a clinical level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".