Sustained Effectiveness, Tolerability, and Safety of Long-Term Prophylaxis with Lanadelumab in Hereditary Angioedema: The Prospective, Phase 4, Noninterventional EMPOWER Real-World Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Lanadelumab is approved for long-term prophylaxis of hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks in patients aged ≥ 2 years in the USA and aged ≥ 12 years in Canada. The EMPOWER Study (NCT03845400) evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of lanadelumab in male and female patients with HAE due to C1 inhibitor deficiency type 1 or 2 from the USA and Canada. Here, we report final, up to 36-month, data. METHODS: Patients aged ≥ 12 years were classified as newly treated with lanadelumab or established on lanadelumab (receiving < 4 and ≥ 4 lanadelumab doses at enrollment, respectively). The primary objective was effectiveness of lanadelumab as measured by HAE attack rate before and after lanadelumab initiation. Safety data were collected. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients received ≥ 1 lanadelumab dose and had ≥ 1 post-baseline safety assessment. Patients were 40.9 (17.4) years of age (mean [standard deviation (SD)]), majority (72/109; 66.1%) female, 37/109 (33.9%) male, and over 90% white. Patients newly treated with and established on lanadelumab received lanadelumab for 737.7 (374.5) (mean [SD]) and 907.1 (469.3) days, respectively, during the study. In patients newly treated with lanadelumab, the mean (95% confidence interval) observed attack rate (attacks/month) decreased by 85% after lanadelumab initiation, from 1.42 (0.34-2.50) pre-lanadelumab to 0.20 (0.02-0.38) post-lanadelumab initiation (cumulative period). Patients established on lanadelumab had an observed attack rate of 0.20 (0.10-0.30) during 36 months' follow-up. Of 154 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), no injection site reactions were reported and 6 (in 2 patients) were considered related to lanadelumab; no lanadelumab-related TEAEs were serious. CONCLUSION: Real-world data from EMPOWER showed marked HAE attack rate reduction up to 36 months after initiating lanadelumab in patients newly treated with lanadelumab and maintenance of low attack rates in patients established on lanadelumab. No new safety signals were identified. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03845400. Graphical abstract available for this article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".