MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411332234 · doi:10.1002/hon.70093_134

134 | EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF FIRST‐LINE IBRUTINIB PLUS VENETOCLAX IN PATIENTS WITH MANTLE CELL LYMPHOMA (MCL) WHO WERE OLDER OR HAD TP53 MUTATIONS IN THE SYMPATICO STUDY

2025· article· en· W4411332234 on OpenAlexaff
M. Wang, Marc Hoffmann, Tomasz Wróbel, Marek Trněný, David Belada, Fatih Demırkan, Panayiotis Panayiotidis, Wojiech Jurczak, Pier Luigi Zinzani, Mary‐Margaret Keating, Sung‐Soo Yoon, M. Egyed, Constantine S. Tam, Nathalie A. Johnson, Edith Szafer‐Glusman, Jennifer Lin, James P. Dean, Jutta K. Neuenburg, Gottfried von Keudell

Bibliographic record

VenueHematological Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsJewish General HospitalQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre
FundersPharmacyclics
KeywordsIbrutinibMantle cell lymphomaVenetoclaxLymphomaMedicineCancer researchOncologyInternal medicineLeukemiaChronic lymphocytic leukemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clinical Trial Information: NCT03112174 Introduction: The phase 3 SYMPATICO study evaluated ibrutinib (Ibr) combined with venetoclax (Ven) in 3 cohorts of patients with MCL: an open-label safety run-in phase to evaluate concurrent initiation of Ibr+Ven in relapsed/refractory (R/R) MCL; a randomized phase to evaluate Ibr+Ven versus Ibr+placebo (Pbo) in R/R MCL; and an open-label cohort to evaluate first-line Ibr+Ven in treatment-naive (TN) MCL. Primary analysis of the randomized phase showed superior progression-free survival (PFS) with Ibr+Ven versus Ibr+Pbo in patients with R/R MCL (Wang M et al. Lancet Oncol. 2025). Here, we report efficacy and safety of Ibr+Ven in patients with TN MCL in older patients (≥ 65 years) or younger patients with a TP53 mutation (TP53mut) (≥ 18 years) who are in need of novel and better tolerated treatment options. Methods: Older patients (≥ 65 years) or patients with a TP53mut with TN MCL received oral Ibr 560 mg once daily and Ven (5-week ramp-up to 400 mg once daily) for 2 years, then single-agent Ibr 560 mg until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate assessed by investigator per Lugano criteria. Key secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), PFS, overall survival (OS), and time to next treatment. Subgroup analyses were performed according to TP53mut status and age. Results: In total, 78 patients with TN MCL were enrolled. At baseline, 83% of patients were ≥ 65 years, 97% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1, 45% had high-risk simplified MCL International Prognostic Index score, 31% had bulky disease (≥ 5 cm), 78% had bone marrow involvement, 46% had splenomegaly, and 37% had TP53mut. Median time on study was 40.5 months (range, 0.6+–46.9). The CR rate was 69% (95% CI: 58–79), and the ORR was 95% (95% CI: 87–99). Median DOR was 37.1 months (95% CI: 30.3–NE). Median PFS was 40.2 months, and 3-year OS was 79%. The CR rate was 76% in patients ≥ 65 years without TP53mut, 44% in patients ≥ 65 years with TP53mut, and 73% in patients < 65 years with TP53mut; median PFS was 40.2, 22.0, and 15.4 months, and 3-year OS was 85%, 66%, and 73%, respectively (Table). Median duration of treatment was 24.0 months (range, 0.3–46.9). Most common adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (49%), fatigue (37%), neutropenia (35%), and COVID-19 (32%). The most common grade ≥ 3 AE was neutropenia (29%). Conclusions: First-line Ibr+Ven showed promising efficacy with high CR rates and durable remissions in patients with TN MCL with and without TP53mut. Safety was acceptable and trended better in younger patients. Ibr+Ven may be an option for older patients with TN MCL or patients of any age with TP53mut. Research funding declaration: This study was funded by Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company Encore Abstract: ASCO 2025; EHA 2025 Keywords: combination therapies Potential sources of conflict of interest: M. Wang Consultant or advisory role: AstraZeneca, Bayer Healthcare, BeiGene, BioInvent, CSTone, DTRM Biopharma (Cayman) Limited, Epizyme, Genentech, InnoCare, Janssen, Juno Therapeutics, Kite Pharma, Loxo Oncology, Miltenyi Biomedicine GmbH, Oncternal, Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company, and VelosBio Honoraria: Acerta Pharma, Anticancer Association, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BGICS, BioInvent, CAHON, Chinese Medical Association, Clinical Care Options, Dava Oncology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Epizyme, Hebei Cancer Prevention Federation, Imedex, Janssen, Kite Pharma LLC, Miltenyi Biomedicine GmbH, Moffit Cancer Center, Mumbai Hematology Group, Newbridge Pharmaceuticals, OMI, OncLive, Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company, Physicians Education Resources (PER), Practice Point Communications (PPC), Scripps, The First Afflicted Hospital of Zhejiang University, and TS Oncology Educational grants: Acerta Pharma, AstraZeneca, BioInvent, Celgene, Janssen, Juno Therapeutics, Kite, Loxo Oncology, Molecular Templates, Oncternal, Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company, Physician Education Resources (PER), VelosBio, and Verastem Other remuneration: Acerta Pharma, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BioInvent, Celgene, Genentech, Innocare, Janssen, Juno Therapeutics, Kite Pharma, Lilly, Loxo Oncology, Molecular Templates, Oncternal, Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company, and VelosBio M. Hoffmann Consultant or advisory role: AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Janssen, Kite, Novartis, Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company, and TG Therapeutics Honoraria: AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Janssen, Kite, Novartis, Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company, and TG Therapeutics T. Wrobel Consultant or advisory role: BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Gilead, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda Honoraria: BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda Other remuneration: Roche M. Trneny Consultant or advisory role: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, Janssen, MorphoSys, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda Honoraria: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, Janssen, MorphoSys, Novartis, Portola, and Takeda Educational grants: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Roche, and Takeda D. Belada Consultant or advisory role: Gilead Sciences, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda Educational grants: Gilead Science, Roche, and Takeda Other remuneration: Genmab, Janssen-Cilag, MorphoSys, and Roche P. Panayiotidis Honoraria: AbbVie, Genesis Pharma, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, and Novartis Educational grants: AbbVie, Genesis Pharma, Novartis, and Roche W. Jurczak Consultant or advisory role: AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Janssen, Loxo Oncology, Roche, and Sandoz Other remuneration: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Celtrion, Celgene, Debiopharm, Epizyme, Incyte, Janssen, Loxo Oncology, Merck, Mei Pharma, MorphoSys, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Sandoz, Takeda, and TG Therapeutics P. L. Zinzani Consultant or advisory role: ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BMS, Incyte, Janssen, Kite/Gilead, Kyowa Kirin, MSD, Novartis, Recordati, Roche, Sandoz, Secura Bio, SERVIER, SOBI, and Takeda Other remuneration: AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BMS, Incyte, Janssen, Kite/Gilead, Kyowa Kirin, MSD, Novartis, Recordati, Roche, SERVIER, SOBI, and Takeda M. Keating Consultant or advisory role: Janssen and Roche S. Yoon Consultant or advisory role: Amgen, Antengene, Janssen, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi, and Takeda Honoraria: Celgene, Janssen, and Novartis Other remuneration: Chong Kun Dang Pharmaceutical Corp, JW Pharmaceutical Corporation, Kyowa Kirin, Roche/Genentech, and Yuhan C. S. Tam Honoraria: AbbVie, BeiGene, Janssen, and LOXO Other remuneration: AbbVie, BeiGene, and Janssen N. A. Johnson Consultant or advisory role: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, Lilly, and Roche/Genentech Honoraria: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, and Incyte Other remuneration: Gilead Sciences, Incyte, and Roche E. Szafer-Glusman Employment or leadership position: AbbVie Stock ownership: AbbVie J. Lin Employment or leadership position: AbbVie Stock ownership: AbbVie J. P. Dean Employment or leadership position: AbbVie Stock ownership: AbbVie J. Neuenburg Employment or leadership position: AbbVie Stock ownership: AbbVie G. von Keudell Consultant or advisory role: AbbVie, Incyte, Merck, and Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company Honoraria: AbbVie, Incyte, Merck, and Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company Other remuneration: AbbVie, Janssen, Merck, Syndax, and TG Therapeutics

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHematological OncologySame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207