MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411536016 · doi:10.3892/ol.2025.15151

Evidence of a functional Smad2/3 signaling axis and TGFβ‑mediated autocrine transcriptional regulation of <i>in vitro</i> vasculogenic mimicry in mesenchymal stem/stromal cells

2025· article· en· W4411536016 on OpenAlexafffund
Kaénon Gnao, Marie-Ève Roy, Alain Zgheib, Michel Desjarlais, Borhane Annabi

Bibliographic record

VenueOncology Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMesenchymal stem cell research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsVasculogenic mimicryAutocrine signallingMesenchymal stem cellCell biologyOncogeneBiologyIn vitroStromal cellCell cycleMolecular medicineCancer researchTransforming growth factorCellCancerCell cultureGeneticsMetastasis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) serves a key physiological role in regulating the mobilization of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) to peripheral blood and injured tissues during ischemic and inflammatory processes. However, it has been suggested that in pathological settings circulating MSCs in peripheral blood contribute to tumor angiogenesis in response to immunosuppressive cytokines, such as TGFβ. The fact that MSCs are unable to fully differentiate into an endothelial angiogenic phenotype suggests that alternative mechanisms, including vasculogenic mimicry (VM), may be involved. The present study aimed to assess the impact of TGFβ signaling on the in vitro formation of 3D capillary‑like structures that recapitulate VM, and to elucidate the underlying signal transduction and molecular mechanisms involved in the vasculogenic function of MSCs. In vitro VM of MSCs was induced on a Cultrex matrix and gene expression was measured by reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR. Protein expression in total lysates or in cytosolic/nuclear fractions was measured by western blotting. Transient gene suppression was performed using small interfering RNA. Cell chemotaxis was assessed using the xCELLigence system. Notably, treatment of MSCs with TGFβ induced the expression of Snail, a key transcription factor regulating epithelial‑to‑mesenchymal transition, as well as its translocation into the nucleus alongside phosphorylated Smad2/3. Similarly, the formation of 3D structures resulted in the upregulation of Snail, FOXC2 and TGFβ expression. Treatment with Galunisertib, a TGFβ receptor (TGFβR) kinase inhibitor, prevented the formation of 3D structures, demonstrating that TGFβR signaling is required for the vasculogenic activity of MSCs. Furthermore, transient silencing of Smad2/3 impaired TGFβ‑mediated cell chemotaxis, which is critical for in vitro VM, reinforcing the previous evidence of the importance of TGFβR activity in this process. Taken together, the present study highlighted a new in vitro alternative mechanism involving VM that allows MSCs to adopt a vasculogenic phenotype. The involvement of TGFβ‑mediated autocrine signaling in VM could represent a new target to modulate the angiogenic activity of MSCs in future anticancer strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOncology LettersSame topicMesenchymal stem cell researchFrench-language works237,207