Testing Higher Doses of Sildenafil to Repair Brain Injury Secondary to Birth Asphyxia: An Open-Label Dose-Finding Phase 1b Clinical Trial–Sildenafil Administration to Treat Neonatal Encephalopathy–Study 02
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of higher doses of sildenafil in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) and brain injury. STUDY DESIGN: A phase 1b open-label dose-finding clinical trial in neonates with moderate-severe HIE and confirmed brain injury on a day-2 magnetic resonance imaging during therapeutic hypothermia (TH). Enteral sildenafil was administered every 12 hours (q12 h) for 7 days. All participants received an initial dose 2.0 mg/kg, and a second dose of 2.5 mg/kg. Starting from the third dose, group 1 received 2.5 mg/kg q12 h and group 2 received 3.0 mg/kg q12 h. Primary outcome was incidence of dose-limiting toxicities. Secondary outcomes explored day-30 neuroimaging and 18-month neurodevelopment. RESULTS: Among the 30 neonates born between October 2019 and December 2021, 20 displayed day-2 brain injury and 13 received sildenafil (8 in group 1; 5 in group 2). In group 1, 25% (2/8) experienced transient hypotension after the first dose, linked to antiseizure medications. No significant hypotension occurred in group 2 when sildenafil was administered separately. At the 3.0 mg/kg/dose, steady-state sildenafil concentrations persisted beyond TH. Death or significant 18-month neurodevelopmental impairment occurred in 50% (4/8) of group 1 and 60% (3/5) of group 2. Among the survivors, partial recovery of brain injury was seen in 80% (4/5) of group 1 and 75% (3/4) of group 2; cerebral palsy developed in 0% (0/5) and 50% (2/4), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Enteral sildenafil up to 3.0 mg/kg q12 h was safe and well tolerated in a small single-center cohort of neonates with HIE treated with TH. Phase 2 trials are needed to assess multicenter feasibility and efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04169191.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".