MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411590237 · doi:10.1101/2025.06.23.661037

Microenvironmental TGF-β is an early driver of NF1-associated tumour formation

2025· preprint· en· W4411590237 on OpenAlexaff
Alex Power, Salome Stierli, Elizabeth Wright, Guillem Mòdol‐Caballero, Stella Kouloulia, Giulia Casal, Omar Bouricha, Ilaria Napoli, Sara Ribeiro, Melanie Clements, Simona Parrinello, Alison C. Lloyd

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
FundersCancer Research UKBloomberg PhilanthropiesNeurofibromatosis Therapeutic Acceleration ProgramJohns Hopkins University
KeywordsTransforming growth factorCancer researchBusinessInternal medicineMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) is a common tumour predisposition syndrome characterised by neurofibromas – Nf1 -/- Schwann cell (SC)-derived tumours of peripheral nerves. We and others have shown that Nf1 loss in SCs is insufficient for neurofibroma formation but cooperates with an injury microenvironment to form tumours, but the mechanisms remained unknown. Here, we identify macrophage-secreted TGF-β as the microenvironmental injury signal that is essential for tumourigenesis. Analysis of the earliest stages of neurofibroma formation showed that tumours arise from a population of Nf1 -/- SCs that ‘escape’ the regenerating nerve shortly after injury. Here, they reside in a distinct microenvironment conducive for tumourigenesis, where TGF-β disrupts SC/axonal interactions and SC re-differentiation. Pharmacological inhibition of TGF-β for a short therapeutic window during this early stage inhibited tumour formation, highlighting the potential to normalise Nf1 -/- SCs and identifying TGF-β as a potential therapeutic target to both treat and prevent neurofibroma formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicNeurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases→French-language works237,207→