Metagenomic Profiling of the Grapevine Virome in Canadian Vineyards
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A high-throughput sequencing-based grapevine metagenomic survey was conducted across all grape-growing Canadian provinces (British Columbia, Ontario, Nova Scotia, and Québec) with the objective of better understanding the grapevine virome composition. In total, 310 composite grapevine samples representing nine Vitis vinifera red; five V. vinifera white; seven American–French red; and five white hybrid cultivars were analyzed. dsRNA, enriched using two different methods, was used as the starting material and source of viral nucleic acids in HTS. The virome status on the distribution and incidence in different regions and grapevine cultivars is addressed. Results from this study revealed the presence of 20 viruses and 3 viroids in the samples tested. Twelve viruses, which are in the regulated viruses list under grapevine certification, were identified in this survey. The major viruses detected in this survey and their incidence rates are GRSPaV (26% to 100%), GLRaV-2 (1% to 18%), GLRaV-3 (15% to 63%), GRVFV (0% to 52%), GRGV (0% to 52%), GPGV (3.3% to 77%), GFkV (1.5% to 31.6%), and GRBV (0% to 19.4%). This survey is the first comprehensive virome study using viral dsRNA and a metagenomics approach on grapevine samples from the British Columbia, Ontario, Nova Scotia, and Quebec provinces in Canada. Results from this survey highlight the grapevine virome distribution across four major grapevine-growing regions and their cultivars. The outcome of this survey underlines the need for strengthening current management options to mitigate the impact of virus spread, and the implementation of a domestic grapevine clean plant program to improve the sanitary status of the grapevine ecosystem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".