MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412727529 · doi:10.1007/s40257-025-00964-6

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Risankizumab to Treat Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Final LIMMitless Phase 3, Open-Label Extension Trial Results

2025· article· en· W4412727529 on OpenAlexaff
Kim Papp, Mark Lebwohl, L. Puig, Mamitaro Ohtsuki, Stefan Beissert, Melinda Gooderham, Ahmad Z. Amin, Tianshuang Wu, Simone Rubant, Brenton Bialik, Doug Ashley, Ahmed M. Soliman, Michael M. Chen, Andrew Blauvelt

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Clinical Dermatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityProbity Medical ResearchUniversity of Toronto
FundersAbbVie
KeywordsMedicinePsoriasis Area and Severity IndexPsoriasisDiscontinuationAdverse effectInternal medicineDermatology Life Quality IndexRandomized controlled trialSeverity of illnessDermatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory disease requiring long-term therapy. Risankizumab, an anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, is approved to treat moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in adults. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of continuous risankizumab treatment through 6 years in adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: LIMMitless, a phase 3, open-label extension study, evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of risankizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis following multiple phase 2/3 base studies. Patients randomized to risankizumab 150 mg at baseline of the base studies (≤ 52 weeks) were eligible to enroll in the LIMMitless study, in which they received risankizumab 150 mg subcutaneously every 12 weeks for an additional 252 weeks. This final analysis assessed safety (treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs]) through 324 weeks and efficacy (including proportions of patients who achieved ≥ 90%/100% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI 90/PASI 100], static Physician's Global Assessment of clear or almost clear [sPGA 0/1], or Dermatology Life Quality Index of no effect on patient's quality of life [DLQI 0/1]) through 304 weeks. RESULTS: Of 897 patients enrolled in the LIMMitless study, 661 completed the study for a total of 4921.2 patient years of exposure to risankizumab. Rates of TEAEs, TEAEs leading to discontinuation, and TEAEs of safety interest were low and consistent with rates observed in previous studies. During the base studies, risankizumab treatment demonstrated high rates of rapid and durable efficacy through 52 weeks; risankizumab treatment also maintained or further improved efficacy and quality-of-life outcomes in the LIMMitless study. At week 304, 86.0% of patients achieved PASI 90, 54.2% achieved PASI 100, 84.7% achieved sPGA 0/1, and 76.3% achieved DLQI 0/1 (using modified nonresponder imputation). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term risankizumab was well tolerated and demonstrated high and durable efficacy through 6 years of continuous treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03047395.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Clinical DermatologySame topicPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisFrench-language works237,207