Biofuel development from flax straw: Torrefaction, steam explosion, and pelletization of treated biomass
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study explores the effects of steam explosion and torrefaction on the chemical and fuel characteristics of flax straw. Flax straw was torrefied at temperatures of 250°C, 275°C, and 300°C, which significantly increased its fixed carbon content and higher heating value, enhancing its energy density as a biofuel. While torrefaction had a pronounced effect on the fuel properties, steam explosion resulted in minimal changes to the biomass characteristics, in comparison. The study also examines the pelletization of torrefied flax straw and evaluates the impact of adding a lignin binder on the quality of bio-pellets. The results indicate that as torrefaction temperature increased from 250 to 300°C, relaxed density of pellets decreased from 894 to 814 kg/m³, and mechanical durability dropped from 79.6 % to 74.2 %. This decline in pellet properties is attributed to the development of pores and a reduction in particle density during thermal treatment. The inclusion of 10 wt% lignin as a binder significantly enhanced pellet durability across all torrefaction temperatures, facilitating fiber inter-diffusion and bond formation. Pellets produced from torrefied flax straw exhibited lower moisture uptake compared with those made from raw flax straw, as reported in literature, because torrefaction eliminated oxygen-containing functional groups, thereby improving their hydrophobicity. However, lignin-modified pellets exhibited a higher moisture uptake (23.3–26.3 wt%) compared with binder-free pellets (13.8–14.8 wt%), due to lignin’s hydrophilic properties relative to torrefied flax straw. This study highlights the potential of torrefied flax straw as a sustainable biofuel feedstock and demonstrates that lignin addition can improve pellet durability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".