MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412792425 · doi:10.1159/000546855

Development of the European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO) Grade-Based Framework on the Pharmacological Treatment of Obesity: Design and Methodological Aspects

2025· article· en· W4412792425 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueObesity Facts · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOrlistatBody mass indexObesityType 2 diabetesComorbidityPopulationWeight lossPhysical therapyWeight managementInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusEnvironmental healthEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The aim of this study was to describe the design and methodological aspects of the upcoming European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO) Framework for the Pharmacological Treatment of Obesity utilizing currently available evidence, which is grounded in a rigorous and transparent approach to evidence synthesis and guideline development. Methods: An expert panel of 13 members, selected by EASO, has developed the framework using the GRADE methodology to ensure transparent, evidence-based guideline development. Clinical questions were formulated using the population, intervention, comparator, outcomes (PICO) framework, focusing on the effectiveness and safety of European Medicines Agency-approved obesity management medications, including orlistat, naltrexone/bupropion, liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide. A comprehensive literature search is being conducted using Medline and Embase, including randomized controlled trials with a minimum duration of 48 weeks. Meta-analyses and network meta-analyses are planned to compare treatment effectiveness and safety profiles across various patient subgroups. The guidelines will target adults with a body mass index (BMI) ≥27 kg/m2 and at least one weight-related comorbidity or a BMI ≥30 kg/m2. The primary endpoint will be total body weight loss. Secondary outcomes include changes in body composition (i.e., fat mass, fat-free mass), metabolic improvements (i.e., glucose levels, HbA1c, lipid profile), remission of obesity-related comorbidities (i.e., type 2 diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, cardiovascular disease, and knee osteoarthritis), and improvements in mental health and quality of life. The methodological framework ensures that recommendations are tailored, evidence-based, and applicable across clinical settings. Conclusions: The EASO framework provides a structured and individualized approach to optimize pharmacological treatment for obesity. Its methodological rigor, based on GRADE and PICO, enhances the reliability, reproducibility, and clinical relevance of the guidelines. By integrating clinical efficacy, safety outcomes, and patient-specific factors, this framework offers solid, actionable guidance to support healthcare professionals in delivering high-quality, personalized obesity care. .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.335

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.157
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it