MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412825463 · doi:10.1002/hbm.70280

Cross‐Dataset Evaluation of Dementia Longitudinal Progression Prediction Models

2025· article· en· W4412825463 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Chen Zhang, Lijun An, Naren Wulan, Kim‐Ngan Nguyen, Csaba Orbán, Pansheng Chen, Christopher Chen, Juan Zhou, Keli Liu, B.T. Thomas Yeo

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Brain Mapping · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Institute on AgingNational Medical Research CouncilNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringTemasek FoundationCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAvid RadiopharmaceuticalsNational Institutes of HealthGenentechIXICOH. Lundbeck A/SServierEisaiNorthern California Institute for Research and EducationMinistry of Health -SingaporeBioClinicaBiogenPfizerNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationUniversity of Southern CaliforniaNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesMeso Scale DiagnosticsMedical Research CouncilU.S. Department of DefenseEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers SquibbAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeAlzheimer's Association
KeywordsNeuroimagingArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceDementiaFeature (linguistics)Multivariate statisticsRecurrent neural networkMachine learningArtificial neural networkDiseasePattern recognition (psychology)NeurosciencePsychologyMedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurately predicting Alzheimer's Disease (AD) progression is useful for clinical care. The 2019 TADPOLE (The Alzheimer's Disease Prediction Of Longitudinal Evolution) challenge evaluated 92 algorithms from 33 teams worldwide. Unlike typical clinical prediction studies, TADPOLE accommodates (1) a variable number of observed time points across patients, (2) missing data across modalities and visits, and (3) prediction over an open-ended time horizon, which better reflects real-world data. However, TADPOLE only used the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset, so how well top algorithms generalize to other cohorts remains unclear. We tested five algorithms in three external datasets covering 2312 participants and 13,200 time points. The algorithms included FROG, the overall TADPOLE winner, which utilized a unique Longitudinal-to-Cross-sectional (L2C) transformation to convert variable-length longitudinal histories into feature vectors of the same length across participants (i.e., same-length feature vectors). We also considered two FROG variants. One variant unified all XGBoost models from the original FROG with a single feedforward neural network (FNN), which we referred to as L2C-FNN. We also included minimal recurrent neural networks (MinimalRNN), which were ranked second at publication time, as well as AD Course Map (AD-Map), which outperformed MinimalRNN at publication time. All five models-three FROG variants, MinimalRNN, and AD-Map-were trained on ADNI and tested on the external datasets. L2C-FNN performed the best overall. In the case of predicting cognition and ventricle volume, L2C-FNN and AD-Map were the best. For clinical diagnosis prediction, L2C-FNN was the best, while AD-Map was the worst. L2C-FNN also maintained its edge over other models, regardless of the number of observed time points and regardless of the prediction horizon from 0 to 6 years into the future. L2C-FNN shows strong potential for both short-term and long-term dementia progression prediction. Pretrained ADNI models are available: https://github.com/ThomasYeoLab/CBIG/tree/master/stable_projects/predict_phenotypes/Zhang2025_L2CFNN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.742

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.437
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman Brain MappingSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207