MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412828528 · doi:10.1021/acscatal.5c03724

Remote Asymmetric Induction via a Chiral Acetylene Equivalent

2025· article· en· W4412828528 on OpenAlexafffund
Xavier Abel‐Snape, Clara Jans, Bijan Mirabi, Moritz K. T. Klischan, Julian J. Melder, Atang Peloewetse, Gregory Hughes, Mark Lautens

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Catalysis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersHeinrich-Heine-Universität DüsseldorfDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversität HeidelbergUniversity of TorontoBaden-Württemberg StiftungForschungszentrum JülichMerck
KeywordsAsymmetric inductionAcetyleneCatalysisChemistryEnantioselective synthesisCombinatorial chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Asymmetric transformations have, to date, typically relied on proximal steric biasing to favor the formation of one enantiomer over the other during the enantiodetermining step. We report the use of an enantioenriched oxabicycle that serves both as a chiral auxiliary and an acetylene surrogate following two selective palladium-catalyzed carbopalladations and a postcatalytic retro-Diels–Alder step. Differentiating functional groups, that are remote from the reactive alkene, direct the reaction with an ortho -iodostyrene and a terminating reagent in a domino fashion, providing enantioenriched indenes. The phosphine ligand has a dramatic influence on the overall process, as alkyl- and arylphosphines lead to opposite major enantiomers of the final indene product.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS CatalysisSame topicSynthesis and Properties of Aromatic CompoundsFrench-language works237,207