MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412884615 · doi:10.1364/boe.568368

Polar organization of H&E dyes in histology tissue revealed by polarimetric nonlinear microscopy

2025· article· en· W4412884615 on OpenAlexafffund
Mykolas Mačiulis, Viktoras Mažeika, Lukas Kontenis, Danielle Tokarz, Richard Cisek, Danutė Bulotienė, Vitalijus Karabanovas, Virginijus Barzda

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedical Optics Express · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSaint Mary's University
FundersNational Research Council CanadaLietuvos Mokslo TarybaCanada Foundation for InnovationResearch Nova ScotiaSaint Mary’s University
KeywordsHistologyMicroscopyPolarimetryOptical microscopeOpticsBiophysicsChemistryBiologyMaterials sciencePathologyMedicinePhysicsScanning electron microscope

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Structural organization of harmonophores used in hematoxylin (H) and eosin (E) staining is studied with polarimetric multimodal second-harmonic generation (SHG), third-harmonic generation (THG), and multiphoton excitation fluorescence (MPF) microscopy in rat tail tendon histology sections. The polarimetric microscopy imaging reveals that hemalums (complexes of hematoxylin and aluminum) are well aligned with C 6 h symmetry along the collagen fibers in H-stained tissue, while eosin Y is partially aligned along the fibers in E-stained tissue and also follows the organization of C 6 h symmetry. When both hemalum and eosin are used for H&E staining, the dye molecules interact and align noncentrosymmetrically with C 6 symmetry along the collagen fibers, while the stained nuclei appear isotropically organized. The polar alignment of the hemalum and eosin complexes increases the achiral second-order susceptibility tensor component ratio R = χ z z z (2) / χ z x x (2) in H&E-stained tissue. The alignment of hemalum and eosin molecules, and their complexes in collagenous tissue, must be considered in nonlinear microscopy and polarimetric analysis of H&E-stained histopathology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.726

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomedical Optics ExpressSame topicAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207