Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Sludge for Biocrude Production and Synergistic Utilization of Byproducts in Anaerobic Digestion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) is a promising thermochemical process for converting sludge into biocrude. However, the effective utilization of other HTL byproducts, such as hydrochar (HC) and an aqueous phase (HTL-AP), remains a significant challenge. This study investigates the synergistic utilization of HTL-AP and HC in anaerobic digestion (AD) for effective biogas production. HTL experiments were conducted at three temperatures (280 °C, 330 °C, and 370 °C). The higher HTL temperatures increased the biocrude yield while reducing HC and AP production. The methane production in AD was influenced by the HTL-AP composition and the presence of HC, with the highest cumulative methane production (327 ± 1.01 mL/g VS) observed for AP produced at 280 °C with HC addition. The addition of HC improved methane production by 25% at 280 °C, 29% at 330 °C, and 19% at 370 °C compared to reactors without HC. HC amendment increased the relative abundance of Firmicutes, Clostridium, and Methanobacterium, supporting improved microbial syntrophic interactions, particularly at 330 °C. The results further suggested that HC might also facilitate direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET), enhancing methane production by promoting electron exchange between syntrophic bacteria and methanogens. These findings highlight the potential of co-utilizing HTL byproducts in AD as a sustainable strategy for sludge management and bioenergy recovery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".