Impaired Glymphatic Clearance, Measured Using Diffusion Tensor Image Analysis Along the Perivascular Space ( <scp>DTI</scp> ‐ <scp>ALPS)</scp> , is Linked to Poor Cognitive Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Impaired glymphatic clearance may contribute to pathological accumulations in Parkinson's (PD), but how it interacts with other processes causing dementia remains unclear. Diffusion tensor image analysis along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS) has been proposed as an indirect proxy for glymphatic clearance. OBJECTIVES: To clarify DTI-ALPS' relationship with cognition in PD, and its relationship with established imaging markers. METHODS: We assessed DTI-ALPS in 98 PD patients (31 PD poor outcomes: dementia, mild cognitive impairment, frailty, or death within a 3-year follow-up; 67 PD good outcomes) and 28 controls. We assessed DTI-ALPS' relationship to cognition, white matter (fiber cross-section), cortical thickness, iron accumulation (quantitative susceptibility mapping [QSM]), and plasma markers [phosphorylated tau-181 (p-tau181 and neurofilament light (NfL)] cross-sectionally and longitudinally). RESULTS: DTI-ALPS was lower in PD-poor outcomes compared with PD good outcomes and controls (P = 0.005) with further longitudinal reductions only in PD poor outcomes (group × time interaction: β = -0.013, P = 0.021). Lower DTI-ALPS was associated with lower fiber cross-section in PD, at baseline and longitudinally but with different spatial distribution from white matter changes relating to PD cognition. There was no correlation between baseline DTI-ALPS and plasma p-tau181 (P = 0.642), NFL (P = 0.448), or baseline cortical thickness. Lower DTI-ALPS was associated with accelerated cortical thinning within left precentral gyrus and changes in brain iron distribution. CONCLUSIONS: PD patients who develop poor outcomes show lower DTI-ALPS, potentially reflecting impaired glymphatic clearance. DTI-ALPS correlated with white matter integrity and brain iron accumulation. However, both showed different spatial distribution than that seen in PD dementia, suggesting DTI-ALPS captures a distinct contribution to cognitive decline. © 2025 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".