Proviruses in CD4 <sup>+</sup> T cells reactive to autologous antigens contribute to nonsuppressible HIV-1 viremia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Antiretroviral therapy (ART) halts human immunodeficiency virus–1 (HIV-1) replication, reducing plasma virus concentrations to below the limit of detection, but it is not curative because of a reservoir of latently infected CD4 + T cells. In some people living with HIV-1 (PLWH), plasma HIV-1 RNA becomes persistently detectable despite optimal ART. This nonsuppressible viremia (NSV) is characterized by identical, nonevolving HIV-1 RNA variants expressed from infected CD4 + T cell clones. The mechanisms driving persistent virus production from a specific population of infected cells are poorly understood. We hypothesized that proviruses in cells responding to chronic immunologic stimuli, including self-associated antigens, may drive viral gene expression and NSV. Here, we demonstrate that stimulation of CD4 + T cells with autologous cell lysates induced virus production in a major histocompatibility complex class II–dependent manner. In seven of eight participants with NSV, we recovered viral RNA released ex vivo in response to autologous cell lysates that matched plasma virus. This process involved both defective and replication-competent proviruses residing in conventional CD4 + T cells and was also observed in PLWH with undetectable viremia. These findings suggest that recognition of self-associated antigens is a potentially important cause of HIV-1 reservoir expression, which can contribute to persistent systemic inflammation and rebound upon ART interruption.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".