Optical Control of Membrane Viscosity Modulates ER-to-Golgi Trafficking
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The lipid composition of cellular membranes is highly dynamic and undergoes continuous remodeling, affecting the biophysical properties critical to biological function. Here, we introduce an optical approach to manipulate membrane viscosity based on an exogenous synthetic fatty acid with an azobenzene photoswitch, termed FAAzo4 . Cells rapidly incorporate FAAzo4 into phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine in a concentration- and cell type-dependent manner. This generates photoswitchable PC and PE analogs, which are predominantly located in the endoplasmic reticulum. Irradiation causes a rapid photoisomerization that decreases membrane viscosity with high spatiotemporal precision. We use the resulting “PhotoCells” to study the impact of membrane viscosity on ER-to-Golgi transport and demonstrate that this two-step process has distinct membrane viscosity requirements. Our approach provides an unprecedented way of manipulating membrane biophysical properties directly in living cells and opens novel avenues to probe the effects of viscosity in a wide variety of biological processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".