MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413236684 · doi:10.1016/j.imbio.2025.153039

VALIANT: Randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial of pegcetacoplan for patients with native or post-transplant recurrent C3G or primary (idiopathic) IC-MPGN

2025· article· en· W4413236684 on OpenAlex
Carla Nester, Andrew S. Bomback, Gema Ariceta, Yahsou Delmas, Bradley P. Dixon, Daniel P. Gale, Larry A. Greenbaum, Seung Hyeok Han, Nicole M. Isbel, Christoph Licht, Antonio Mastrangelo, Masashi Mizuno, Maria Izabel Neves de Holanda, Matthew C. Pickering, Giuseppe Remuzzi, Nicole C. A. J. van de Kar, Marina Vivarelli, Patrick D. Walker, Dean Wallace, Daniel Zecher, Li Li, Zhongshen Wang, Luis López Lázaro, Johan Szamosi, Fádi Fakhouri

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueImmunobiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlaceboDouble blindMedicineInternal medicinePhases of clinical researchPediatricsClinical trialPathologyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

C3 glomerulopathy (C3G) and primary immune complex-membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (IC-MPGN) are complement-mediated diseases driven by C3 dysregulation with excessive accumulation of C3 breakdown products in the kidney. Pegcetacoplan (PEG) a C3/C3b inhibitor, targets the central components of the complement pathway, directly inhibiting C3 overactivation and preventing further deposition of C3 breakdown products in the glomeruli. VALIANT (NCT05067127) is the first Phase 3 trial investigating PEG in a broad cohort, including adolescents (≥12 yrs) and adults with native or post-transplant recurrent C3G or primary IC-MPGN. VALIANT is a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled trial evaluating PEG efficacy and safety. 124 pts were randomized to PEG (n = 63) (twice weekly subcutaneous infusion) or PBO (n = 61) for 26 weeks (wks). The primary endpoint was log-transformed UPCR ratio at wk 26 vs baseline, assessing proteinuria reduction vs PBO. Key secondary endpoints at wk 26 were a composite renal endpoint (proportion of pts achieving ≥50% UPCR and ≤15% eGFR decline), proportion of patients achieving ≥50% UPCR reduction, C3G histologic index activity score change (adjusted LS mean change), reduced C3c renal biopsy staining of ≥2 OOM, eGFR change, (LS mean change), mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Safety was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) frequency and severity. The primary endpoint was met, with PEG demonstrating a 68.1% (95% CI: –76.2, –57.3) mean UPCR reduction vs. PBO at wk 26 (p < 0.0001). Results were consistent across disease type, age, and transplant status subgroups. PEG also led to robust reductions in C3c staining and clinically meaningful eGFR stabilization vs PBO. Treatment-emergent AE frequency and severity were similar between arms. None of the 4 serious infections (3 PEG; 1 PBO) were attributed to encapsulated bacteria. PEG is the first therapy to achieve significant and clinically meaningful reductions in proteinuria (68.1% vs. PBO), C3c staining and eGFR stabilization in pts ≥12 yrs with C3G or primary IC-MPGN. PEG was well tolerated with no new safety signals observed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.850

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it