MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413289215 · doi:10.1016/j.microb.2025.100509

Breaking Staphylococcus aureus biofilms with the antimicrobial lipopeptide humimycin and its synthetic analogs

2025· article· en· W4413289215 on OpenAlexafffund
Md Ramim Tanver Rahman, Florence Henley, Ismaı̈l Fliss, Éric Biron

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Microbe · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLipopeptideStaphylococcus aureusAntimicrobialMicrobiologyBiofilmBiologyChemistryBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The growing burden of biofilm-associated infections and antibiotic resistance driven by Staphylococcus aureus underscores the urgent need for new antimicrobial agents and new strategies. To address this challenge, antimicrobial lipopeptides like humimycins have emerged as promising candidates for combating Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. In this study, humimycin A 1 and five structural analogs ( 2 - 6 ) were synthesized via solid-phase peptide synthesis and evaluated for antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity against S. aureus ATCC 29213. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and minimum biofilm inhibitory concentrations (MBIC) values were determined using broth microdilution and crystal violet staining assays, respectively. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to visualize changes in biofilm morphology, while sliding motility assays assessed the impact on virulence-associated bacterial movement. The newly introduced analogs displayed MIC values ranging from 2 to 16 µg/mL, with analog 6 showing the strongest activity. In biofilm inhibition assays, analogs 5 and 6 exhibited MBIC of 4 µg/mL and 2 µg/mL, respectively, up to 16-fold lower than the parental compound. Treatment of mature biofilms with analogs 3–6 at four times the MIC led to biomass reductions ranging from 74.8 % to 89.8 %. Scanning electron microscopy confirmed disrupted biofilm architecture following treatment. Furthermore, analogs 4 and 6 significantly inhibited sliding motility, a virulence factor linked to colonization. Resistance development was not observed after 10 serial passages under sub-MIC treatments. These findings highlight the therapeutic potential of synthetic humimycin analogs as precision antibiofilm agents against S. aureus infections. • Synthetic humimycin analogs showed good antimicrobial activity against S. aureus . • The analogs are able to inhibit biofilm formation and disrupt mature biofilm. • The sliding motility of S. aureus was also inhibited by the synthetic lipopeptides. • Low emergence of resistance was observed after several expositions to the analogs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.434

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe MicrobeSame topicBacterial biofilms and quorum sensingFrench-language works237,207