Common Biological Properties of <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> MmpL3 Inhibitors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide MmpL3 is a promising new target for antitubercular drugs, but the microbiological properties of MmpL3 inhibitors are not fully understood. We compared the activity and mode of action of 11 structurally diverse compound series that target MmpL3. We confirmed the activity was via MmpL3 using strains with differential expression of MmpL3. MmpL3 inhibitors had potent activity against replicating M. tuberculosis, with increased activity against intramacrophage bacilli and were rapidly bactericidal. MmpL3 inhibition induced cell wall stress concomitantly with a boost in the ATP levels in M. tuberculosis . Mutation in MmpL3 conferred resistance to all series at different levels. The molecules did not negatively impact membrane potential, pH homeostasis, or induce reactive oxygen species and were inactive against starved bacilli. Our study revealed common features related to the chemical inhibition of MmpL3, enabling the identification of off-target effects and highlighting the potential of such compounds as future drug candidates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".