MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413323486 · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.102303

TYK2 inhibition enhances Treg differentiation and function while preventing Th1 and Th17 differentiation

2025· article· en· W4413323486 on OpenAlexafffund
Karoliina Tuomela, Rosa V. Garcia, Dominic A. Boardman, P Tavakoli, Maria Ancheta-Schmit, Ho Pan Sham, Lihong Cheng, Mary Struthers, Brian Bressler, Bruce A. Vallance, Qihong Zhao, Megan K. Levings

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Reports Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and B-cell Immunology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Children's Hospital
FundersMichael Smith Health Research BCBC Children's HospitalCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsFunction (biology)Cell biologyImmunologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are widely used to inhibit inflammatory cytokine signaling in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, but their effect on regulatory T cells (Tregs) is poorly characterized. We investigated the effect of a JAK inhibitor, upadacitinib, on human Treg differentiation and phenotype in comparison to BMS-986202, a selective Tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitor. Both upadacitinib and BMS-986202 blocked naive CD4 + T cell differentiation into Th1/17 cells, but only BMS-986202 and a related TYK2 inhibitor, deucravacitinib, spared interleukin-2 (IL-2) signaling and Treg induction. BMS-986202 also increased Treg suppressive function and stability under Th1/17-polarizing conditions, whereas upadacitinib significantly impaired the phenotype and viability of ex vivo Tregs. In lamina propria mononuclear cells from patients with inflammatory bowel disease cultured under Th17-polarizing conditions, BMS-986202 redirected CD4 + T cells toward a Treg phenotype. The Treg-sparing and enhancing properties of TYK2 inhibition suggest that TYK2 inhibitors are a promising pharmacological approach for tolerance induction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.638

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell Reports MedicineSame topicT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyFrench-language works237,207