MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413340629 · doi:10.1242/dmm.052253

HTRA1-dependent proteolysis induces age-related retinal degeneration and exacerbates choroidal neovascularization

2025· article· en· W4413340629 on OpenAlexaff
Kenneth J. Katschke, Tom Truong, Victoria C. Pham, Hongkang Xi, Wanjian Tang, Xiaowu Gu, Pooja Teotia, Jeffrey W. Hofmann, S. Chaney, Daniel Kirchhofer, Menno van Lookeren Campagne, Marion Jeanne

Bibliographic record

VenueDisease Models & Mechanisms · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and genetic disorders
Canadian institutionsMicrosemi (Canada)
FundersGenentech
KeywordsMacular degenerationChoroidal neovascularizationRetinalRetinal pigment epitheliumRetinaRetinal degenerationNeovascularizationBiologyPEDFPathologyMedicineOphthalmologyCancer researchAngiogenesisNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polymorphisms in the ARMS2/HTRA1 locus on chromosome 10 enhance the risk of geographic atrophy and macular neovascularization, the advanced forms of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Although HTRA1 mutations have been associated with microvascular defects in the brain, it remains unclear whether changes in HTRA1 expression contribute to AMD pathophysiology. In this study, we showed that, in AMD donor eyes, HTRA1 protein accumulated around the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE)/photoreceptor lesions. We then demonstrated that overexpression of catalytically active, but not catalytically inactive, HTRA1 in RPE cells in mice induced age-dependent loss of photoreceptors, inflammation and a decline in photoreceptor functional responses. This retinal degeneration was not exacerbated when the mice were exposed to phototoxic stress in the constant light exposure preclinical model. However, mice overexpressing catalytically active HTRA1 had significant exacerbation of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization lesions. Finally, as substrate processing may define the molecular basis for HTRA1-induced retinal degeneration, we initiated a proteomics approach and identified the visual cycle key player RBP3 as a disease-relevant HTRA1 substrate in the retina.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.356
Threshold uncertainty score0.900

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDisease Models & MechanismsSame topicCerebrovascular and genetic disordersFrench-language works237,207