MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413386609 · doi:10.1101/2025.08.19.25332842

HNK-1 Antibody-Based ELISA for Soluble PTPRZ: A Practical Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarker for Glioma

2025· preprint· en· W4413386609 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yu Naruse, Masazumi Fujii, Kenichiro Nagai, Ryo Hiruta, T Sakagami, Kazuto Takahashi, Junko Iijima, Hideaki Suzuki, Kasumi Hattori, Kazuaki Kanai, Yuka Oka, Yuko Hashimoto, Shunichi Koriyama, Taiichi Saito, Yoshihiro Muragaki, Takakazu Kawamata, Takashi Sasayama, Jun Yasuda, Miwa Uzuki, Yasushi Kawaguchi, Yoshiki Yamaguchi, Shiori Go, Hiromu Arakawa, Hiroyuki Kaji, Shinobu Kitazume

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Glycomics NetworkInstitute of Medical Science, University of TokyoMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyUniversity of TokyoJapan Agency for Medical Research and DevelopmentMizutani Foundation for Glycoscience
KeywordsCerebrospinal fluidBiomarkerGliomaAntibodyMedicineChemistryCancer researchPathologyImmunologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Reliable fluid biomarkers for glioma remain elusive, complicating diagnosis and differentiation from primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). We evaluated soluble protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type Z (sPTPRZ) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) using an anti-HNK-1 antibody-based ELISA. CSF sPTPRZ levels were significantly elevated in glioma patients compared with controls (AUC = 0.910) and moderately distinguished gliomas from PCNSL (AUC = 0.805). Immunohistochemistry and qPCR confirmed lack of PTPRZ expression in PCNSL, while epitope mapping localized the HNK-1 modification site to exon 12 of the long isoform. RNA-seq of the C-CAT database revealed PTPRZ-MET fusions in 2% of gliomas, all lacking the HNK-1 epitope, consistent with low CSF sPTPRZ in a subset of tumors. These findings establish CSF sPTPRZ detection with anti-HNK-1 antibody as a minimally invasive and robust biomarker for glioma, supporting improved diagnostic accuracy and aiding clinical decision-making in neuro-oncology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→