MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413964893 · doi:10.1200/jco-25-00272

Xevinapant or Placebo Plus Platinum-Based Chemoradiotherapy in Unresected Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (TrilynX): A Randomized, Phase III Study

2025· article· en· W4413964893 on OpenAlexaff
Jean Bourhis, Lisa Licitra, Barbara Burtness, Amanda Psyrri, Robert I. Haddad, Kevin J. Harrington, Ezra E.W. Cohen, Yungan Tao, Katsuki Arima Tiscoski, Amiran Matitashvili, Makoto Tahara, Ammar Sukari, Tomasz Rutkowski, Sébastien Salas, Heidi Nauwelaerts, Rudi Scheerlinck, Nguyen Thi Thu Ha, Andreas Schröder, Almudena Rodriguez‐Gutierrez, Jonathan D. Schoenfeld

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePlaceboClinical endpointChemoradiotherapyHazard ratioInternal medicineAdverse effectPhases of clinical researchHead and neck squamous-cell carcinomaSurgeryUrologyHead and neck cancerGastroenterologyRadiation therapyRandomized controlled trialChemotherapyConfidence intervalPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE TrilynX was a randomized, double-blind, phase III study evaluating the addition of xevinapant (an inhibitor of apoptosis proteins inhibitor) or placebo to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with unresected locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA SCCHN). METHODS Patients with unresected LA SCCHN (oropharynx [p16-negative only], hypopharynx, or larynx) were randomly assigned 1:1 to six cycles of oral xevinapant 200 mg/day or matched placebo (once daily on Days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle) plus CRT for the first three cycles (cisplatin [100 mg/m 2 once on Day 2 of every cycle] plus intensity-modulated radiotherapy [70 Gy; 35 fractions of 2 Gy/day, 5 days/week]). The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS) assessed by the blinded independent review committee. Progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), and safety were secondary end points. RESULTS Between September 20, 2020, and February 27, 2023, 730 patients were randomly assigned to xevinapant plus CRT (n = 364) or placebo plus CRT (n = 366). The median (95% CI) EFS was 19.4 months (14.5 to not estimable) with xevinapant and 33.1 months (21.0 to not estimable) with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 1.33 [95% CI, 1.05 to 1.67]; P = .9919). OS was worse in the xevinapant arm (HR, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.04 to 1.86]). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 320 (87.9%; xevinapant) and 286 (80.3%; placebo) patients; anemia (78 [21.4%] v 51 [14.3%]) and neutropenia (71 [19.5%] v 69 [19.4%]) were the most common. Serious TEAEs occurred in 194 (53.3%; xevinapant) and 129 (36.2%; placebo) patients. TEAEs leading to death occurred in 22 (6.0%; xevinapant) and 13 (3.7%; placebo) patients. CONCLUSION Xevinapant plus CRT did not improve EFS (EFS was shorter with xevinapant v placebo) and demonstrated an unfavorable safety profile versus placebo plus CRT in patients with unresected LA SCCHN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.452
Teacher spread0.389 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicHead and Neck Cancer StudiesFrench-language works237,207