Caffeine impairs red blood cell storage quality by dual inhibition of ADORA2b signaling and G6PD activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Caffeine is the most widely consumed psychoactive substance globally, yet its peripheral physiological effects remain incompletely understood. Leveraging comprehensive data from 13,091 blood donors in the REDS RBC-Omics study, we identified caffeine as a significant modulator of red blood cell (RBC) storage quality and transfusion outcomes. Elevated caffeine levels were reproducible across multiple donations from 643 recalled donors, selected based on their extremes in hemolytic propensity. Both in the screening and recalled cohorts, higher caffeine levels were associated with disrupted RBC metabolism, characterized by reduced glycolysis, depletion of adenylate pools or 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate, and increased markers of oxidative stress and osmotic fragility, including kynurenine accumulation. These observations were recapitulated in plasma and RBC of eight volunteers upon consumption of a cup of coffee independently of brewing method (Chemex vs. espresso). Clinically, elevated caffeine levels correlated with increased hemolysis and lower post-transfusion hemoglobin increments, an effect especially pronounced in recipients transfused with RBC from donors carrying common polymorphisms in the ADORA2B gene, a key regulator of RBC metabolism in hypoxia. These human findings were mechanistically validated using a murine model deficient in ADORA2b, which demonstrated impaired glycolytic flux, compromised antioxidant defenses (including caffeine-dependent direct inhibition of recombinantly expressed glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase), and decreased transfusion efficacy (lower hemoglobin increments, higher bilirubin after transfusion), effects further exacerbated by caffeine exposure during storage. Our study positions caffeine consumption as a modifiable factor in blood transfusion practice, advocating for precision strategies that integrate genetic and exposome factors, and identifies metabolic interventions to enhance blood quality and clinical outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".