MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414040479 · doi:10.1139/gen-2025-0007

Diversity of <i>tet</i>(L)-bearing plasmids found in Eastern Canadian <i>Staphylococcus hyicus</i> isolates from swine

2025· article· en· W4414040479 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Cynthia Gagné-Thivierge, Marie-Lou Gauthier, Martine Denicourt, M Lambert, Antony T. Vincent, Steve J. Charette

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCTT Group (Canada)Ministère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'AlimentationUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlasmidTetracyclineGeneAntibiotic resistanceStrain (injury)GenomeVirulencePhylogenetic treePhylogenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Staphylococcus hyicus is the etiological agent of exudative epidermitis (EE) in suckling and weaned piglets, which is an endemic disease of concern for animal health and welfare on swine farms. Staphylococcus hyicus is not widely studied, and there is no recent scientific literature on Canadian strains. In a preliminary study, we presented an Eastern Canadian S. hyicus strain isolated from an EE case and bearing a plasmidic tet(L) gene conferring resistance to tetracyclines, one of the most commonly used antibiotics in Canadian swine farms. The current study characterized the tet(L)-bearing plasmids present in S. hyicus isolates from pigs in Eastern Canadian to better understand the potential vectors for this gene dissemination. Eleven S. hyicus isolates harboring tet(L) as the only tetracycline resistance gene were sequenced using Oxford Nanopore Technology and analyzed. Eight different tet(L)-bearing plasmids were identified that share similarities with Staphylococcus aureus sequences available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Only one of the plasmids was present in more than one isolate and two isolates carried tet(L) on their chromosome. This suggests a high diversity of tet(L)-bearing plasmids in S. hyicus and the possible need to analyze swine farm samples over time to understand the dynamics of tet(L) in S. hyicus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.606
Threshold uncertainty score0.784

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomeSame topicAntimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusFrench-language works237,207