A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis to Prevent Urinary Tract Infections after Shockwave Lithotripsy for Urolithiasis: The APPEAL Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) carries a risk of postprocedural infection. Use of antibiotic prophylaxis by clinicians is variable and international guidelines provide conflicting recommendations, reflecting low-certainty evidence. We investigated whether antibiotic prophylaxis reduces bacteriuria and post-SWL urinary tract infections (UTIs). METHODS: APPEAL, an international multicenter, blinded trial, randomized adults undergoing SWL for urolithiasis to a single dose of ciprofloxacin or placebo. The primary outcome was the incidence of a composite of bacteriuria or symptomatic UTI after SWL. Other outcomes included the incidence of pyelonephritis or urosepsis. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Of the 1722 randomized patients, 28 underwent postrandomization exclusions (mainly nonvisualizable stones). Among the analysis population (n = 1694; median age 50 yr; 30% female), 74% had kidney stones and 26% had ureteral stones. Bacteriuria (without symptoms) or symptomatic UTI occurred in 20 patients (2.7%) in the ciprofloxacin arm and 30 (3.9%) in the placebo arm (risk ratio [RR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-1.15). Symptomatic UTI occurred in ten patients (1.3%) in the ciprofloxacin arm and 21 (2.7%) in the placebo arm (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.19-1.23). No patients in the ciprofloxacin arm and nine (1.2%) in the placebo arm developed pyelonephritis (RR 0.05, 95% CI 0.003-0.93). No patients developed urosepsis and no serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: A single dose of ciprofloxacin reduced the risk of post-SWL pyelonephritis, with a modest absolute benefit. The patient importance of this reduction depends on individual preferences in weighing a small absolute reduction in risk against the potential harms and resistance-related implications of antibiotic use. Results from the APPEAL trial will inform global practice and support evidence-based decision-making for patients undergoing SWL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".