MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414540628 · doi:10.12688/hrbopenres.14159.1

Real world use of avacopan for ANCA-associated vasculitis. First experiences in Ireland.

2025· article· en· W4414540628 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Cummiskey, Eithne Nic an Ríogh, Cliona Cowhig, Sinéad Stoneman, Sarah Moran, Ciara N. Magee, Susan McAnallen, Catherine Wall, Michael R. Clarkson, Mark A. Little

Bibliographic record

VenueHRB Open Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVasculitis and related conditions
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscontinuationGranulomatosis with polyangiitisVasculitisAdverse effectCohortPrednisoloneRegimenRituximab

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<ns3:p>Background Avacopan, a selective complement 5a receptor (C5aR) antagonist, is used for the treatment of severe active granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) or microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) in combination with rituximab or cyclophosphamide. By reducing glucocorticoid exposure and associated toxicity, avacopan can improve patient outcomes. This report presents the first clinical experience with avacopan in the treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) in the Republic of Ireland. Methods Ten patients received avacopan between December 2017 and April 2024 through the Irish early access program and the ADVOCATE trial (n=2). Data were extracted from the RITA Ireland Vasculitis (RIV) database and retrospective chart review. Collected variables included the commencement date, indication for avacopan initiation, ANCA subtype, organ involvement, number of relapses, concurrent and prior immunosuppressive medications, and adverse events. Results Avacopan was primarily initiated for patients requiring a steroid-sparing regimen due to contraindications such as severe osteoporosis, prior eating disorders, anxiety, or steroid-induced psychosis, as well as patient preference to avoid corticosteroids. On average, patients received 2.285 grams of prednisolone equivalent prior to avacopan initiation (range: 0–8.125 grams). Most patients achieved disease control without requiring further steroid therapy. Avacopan is generally well-tolerated. The reported adverse events in this cohort were headache, limited maculopapular rash, neutropenia, and liver dysfunction. Two patients experienced disease relapse upon discontinuation of avacopan, both of whom had the longest follow-up durations. Conclusion This study is the first real-world evaluation of avacopan use in Ireland. Although the sample size was small, avacopan demonstrated a favourable safety profile and efficacy in reducing corticosteroid dependence. As of July 1, 2024, avacopan was funded by the Irish Health Service Executive, improving accessibility. Further long-term follow-up is warranted to assess the relapse risk and establish the optimal treatment duration.</ns3:p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.400
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.149
GPT teacher head0.437
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHRB Open ResearchSame topicVasculitis and related conditionsFrench-language works237,207