MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414582886 · doi:10.21608/jlr.2025.385720.1742

Nationality of Children Born Through Surrogacy Abroad: A Conflict of Laws Perspective / جنسية الأطفال المولودين عبر الأم البديلة في الخارج منظور في تنازع القوانين

2025· article· ar· W4414582886 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
نورهان موسى

Bibliographic record

Venueمجلة البحوث الفقهية والقانونية · 2025
Typearticle
Languagear
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicConflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNationalityLegislatureStatelessnessConflict of lawsHuman rightsSovereigntyPerspective (graphical)Foreign national

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research addresses the legal challenges surrounding the nationality of children born through surrogacy arrangements abroad, within the framework of private international law. The increasing prevalence of cross-border surrogacy has given rise to significant legal uncertainty, particularly regarding the recognition of parentage and the transmission of nationality. The study highlights the risk of statelessness when states refuse to recognize surrogacy or the intended parental relationship, leaving children without legal identity or protection. A comparative analysis is conducted between Egypt, where surrogacy is implicitly prohibited on religious and ethical grounds; France, where surrogacy is categorically banned, and ordre public objections often prevent recognition of foreign arrangements; and Canada, where altruistic surrogacy is permitted under a regulated framework, ensuring recognition of parentage and conferral of citizenship. Drawing on international human rights law, comparative family law, and private international law doctrines, the research proposes legislative and judicial solutions aimed at balancing national sovereignty with the best interests of the child, particularly their rights to nationality, identity, and family life. يتناول هذا البحث الإشكالية القانونية المتعلقة بجنسية الأطفال المولودين عبر ترتيبات الأم البديلة خارج الحدود الوطنية، في ظل اختلاف النظم القانونية وتباين المواقف التشريعية تجاه عمليات الحمل البديل. فقد أدى انتشار هذه الممارسة إلى نشوء تحديات قانونية عميقة، أبرزها احتمالية حرمان الطفل من حقه في الجنسية أو تأخير الاعتراف بهويته القانونية، مما قد يفضي إلى حالات انعدام الجنسية. يعرض البحث دراسة مقارنة بين مصر، حيث يُنظر إلى الحمل البديل باعتباره غير مشروع استنادًا إلى اعتبارات دينية وأخلاقية؛ وفرنسا، التي تحظر جميع أشكال الحمل البديل وتستند إلى النظام العام في رفض الاعتراف بالترتيبات الأجنبية؛ وكندا، التي تسمح بالحمل البديل غير التجاري وتضع أطرًا قانونية للاعتراف بالأبوة ومنح الجنسية. كما يستند البحث إلى مبادئ القانون الدولي لحقوق الإنسان وقواعد القانون الدولي الخاص، لاقتراح حلول توازن بين سيادة الدول وضرورة حماية مصلحة الطفل الفضلى، لاسيما حقه في الهوية والجنسية والحياة الأسرية.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.015
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueمجلة البحوث الفقهية والقانونيةSame topicConflict of Laws and JurisdictionFrench-language works237,207