MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Corrigendum to GRADE guidance 39: using GRADE-ADOLOPMENT to adopt, adapt or create contextualized recommendations from source guidelines and evidence syntheses [Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 81 (2024) 111494]

2025· article· en· W4414625230 on OpenAlexaff
Miloslav Klugar, Tamara Lotfi, Andrea Darzi, Marge Reinap, Jitka Klugarová, Lucia Kantorová, Jun Xia, Romina Brignardello‐Petersen, Andrea Pokorná, Glen Hazlewood, Zachary Munn, Rebecca L. Morgan, Ingrid Toews, Ignacio Neumann, Patraporn Tungpunkom, Aírton Tetelbom Stein, Michael McCaul, Alexander G. Mathioudakis, Kristen E. D’Anci, Grigorios I. Leontiadis, Celeste Naude, Lenny Vasanthan, Joanne Khabsa, Małgorzata M Bała, Reem A. Mustafa, Karen DiValerio Gibbs, Robby Nieuwlaat, Nancy Santesso, Dawid Pieper, Saphia Mokrane, Israa Soghier, Wanchai Lertwatthanawilat, Wojtek Wiercioch, Shahnaz Sultan, Jana Rozmarinová, Pavla Drapáčová, Yang Song, Marwa Ahmed Amer, Yasser Sami Amer, Shahab Sayfi, Ilse M. Verstijnen, Ein-Soon Shin, Zuleika Saz‐Parkinson, Kevin Pottie, Alessandra Ruspi, Ana Marušić, KM Saif‐Ur‐Rahman, María Ximena Rojas, Elie A Akl, Holger J. Schünemann

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of CalgaryImpactMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRegretPublishingMEDLINEClinical epidemiologyEpidemiologyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.042
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.411
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.737

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0420.411
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.009
Bibliometrics0.0150.009
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0110.004
Open science0.0080.009
Research integrity0.0220.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2200.197

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.742
GPT teacher head0.621
Teacher spread0.120 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical EpidemiologySame topicHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionFrench-language works237,207