MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414818795 · doi:10.7759/cureus.93838

Finger-Equipped Electrode Electrical Stimulation for Severe Upper-Limb Paresis in the Acute Phase of Stroke: A Retrospective Case Series

2025· article· en· W4414818795 on OpenAlexaff
Kei Hamamachi

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsSouth Okanagan General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParesisStroke (engine)SpasticityFunctional electrical stimulationRehabilitationWilcoxon signed-rank testAcute strokeStimulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aim and objective Severe upper-limb paresis during the acute phase of stroke significantly limits functional recovery. Finger-equipped electrode electrical stimulation (FEE-ES) enables therapists to synchronize electrical stimulation (ES) with the patient's motor intent, even in the absence of voluntary movement. However, evidence regarding its feasibility and preliminary therapeutic effects in the acute phase of stroke remains limited. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and potential therapeutic effects of FEE-ES in patients in the acute phase of stroke who present with severe upper-limb paresis. Materials and methods We retrospectively examined six patients (mean age: 56.0 ± 15.0 years) with a first-ever stroke and severe upper-limb paresis (baseline Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) ≤19), without severe cognitive or attentional deficits. FEE-ES was applied for approximately one month during the acute phase as part of the rehabilitation program. Upper-limb motor function was assessed using the FMA-UE and the upper-limb items of the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS). Spasticity and skin integrity were monitored throughout the intervention. Results The median baseline FMA-UE score was 4.0 (range: 4-6) points, which improved to 16.0 (range: 7-27) points after one month (p = 0.031, Wilcoxon signed-rank exact test; effect size r = 0.86). The Hodges-Lehmann estimator indicated a median improvement of 11 points (95% confidence interval: 3-23). Three patients exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 10 points. The median SIAS-Knee-Mouth and Finger Function scores increased from 0 to 1.5, and from 0.5 to 1.0, respectively. However, no increase in spasticity or skin complications was observed. Four participants had follow-up assessments at two months after stroke onset, and all exhibited continued functional gains. Conclusion This retrospective case series demonstrated that FEE-ES in the acute phase of stroke is feasible, safe, and may be associated with significant improvements in upper-limb motor function in patients with severe paresis. Notably, some individuals exhibited continued functional gains beyond the acute stage, suggesting that early synchronization of motor intent with ES may promote long-term recovery. Although preliminary, these findings support the potential of FEE-ES as an adjunct rehabilitation strategy and highlight the need for additional controlled studies to confirm efficacy and optimize protocols.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureus→Same topicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery→French-language works237,207→