The phenotypic variation of <i>widefins</i> medaka is due to the insertion of a giant transposon containing a viral genome within the hoxca cluster
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phenotypic variation in species arises from genetic differences and environmental influences on gene expression. Differences in epigenetic modifications, such as histone modifications and DNA methylation, can also contribute to phenotypic variations, even among individuals with identical genetic information. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms are not yet fully understood, particularly in vertebrates. The number of fin rays in teleosts, such as medaka, serves as a useful model for studying this variation. In a previous study, we demonstrated that the teleost Hox code plays a crucial role in determining the anterior-posterior identity necessary for the formation of dorsal and anal fins. In this study, we investigated widefins medaka, a spontaneous mutant displaying phenotypic variation in the number of dorsal and anal fin rays. Long-read whole-genome sequencing revealed that an extremely large transposon, Teratorn, containing a herpesvirus genome, was inserted into the hoxc12a 3'-UTR. This insertion decreased hoxc12a expression and, in some cases, also affected neighboring hox genes, resulting in variations in fin size and the presence or absence of dorsal fins. Additionally, hoxc6a, located 50 kb away from the insertion, was also downregulated in widefins medaka. These findings suggest that this large transposon insertion leads to a reduction in nearby hox gene expression, contributing to the phenotypic variation observed in widefins medaka. These results highlight the role of transposable elements and epigenetic regulation in generating phenotypic diversity in vertebrates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".