MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414886793 · doi:10.1364/oe.565872

Radiation hardness properties and DCR reduction via laser annealing of InGaAs/InP SPADs for space applications

2025· article· en· W4414886793 on OpenAlexaff
Lorenzo Finazzi, Fabio Signorelli, Marta Bagatin, Simone Gerardin, Mujtaba Zahidy, Giuseppe Vallone, Thomas Jennewein, Paolo Villoresi, Alberto Tosi

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Express · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Optical Sensing Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiation hardeningDark currentRadiationRadiation damageDiodeIrradiationAnnealing (glass)Detector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a theoretical and experimental study of proton radiation effects on the performance of InGaAs/InP single-photon avalanche diodes (SPADs), used in applications such as space communications and remote sensing, where single-photon detectors for the telecom-compatible near-infrared (NIR) wavelengths are required. The devices were exposed to 3 MeV protons at different fluences. At high fluences (above 10 10 protons/cm 2 ), we measured large variations in dark current, breakdown voltage, and dark count rate, while at lower fluences (below 10 9 protons/cm 2 ), minor variations in dark count rate, negligible variations in the dark current, and no shift in the breakdown voltage were observed. Combining experimental results with TRIM simulations, we determined the proton radiation hardness parameters, including the acceptable displacement damage dose (DDD) to avoid catastrophic failure of these types of photodiodes. Furthermore, we experimentally investigated the mitigation of the radiation damage through annealing by means of high-power lasers, and we observed a significant reduction in the dark count rate of the InGaAs/InP SPADs that were irradiated at low fluences. Our study provides important guidance on using telecom-wavelength compatible single-photon detectors in a space environment and shows that such devices are good candidates for satellite-based quantum communication nodes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.725
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics ExpressSame topicAdvanced Optical Sensing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207