A genome-wide association study identified 10 novel genomic loci associated with intrinsic capacity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intrinsic capacity (IC) is a multidimensional concept within the World Health Organization framework for healthy aging. It refers to the composite of an individual's physical and mental capacities that enable them to maintain well-being, functional ability, and engagement in valued activities throughout life. While substantial evidence supports the biological basis of IC and its subdomains, the extent to which genetic factors influence IC remains largely unexplored, with no studies currently available. METHODS: Using datasets from the UK Biobank (UKB; N = 44 631) and the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA; N = 13 085), we implemented the restricted maximum likelihood method to estimate SNP-based heritability (h2snp), followed by a Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) to identify genetic variants associated with IC, and post-GWAS analyses to pinpoint biological implications. RESULTS: The h2snp for IC was estimated at 25.2% in UKB and 19.5% in CLSA. Our GWAS identified 38 independent SNPs for IC across 10 genomic loci and 4289 candidate SNPs, mapped to 197 genes. Post-GWAS analysis revealed the role of these genes in cellular processes such as cell proliferation, immune function, metabolism, and neurodegeneration, with high expression in muscle, heart, brain, adipose, and nerve tissues. Of the 52 traits tested, 23 showed significant genetic correlations with IC, and a higher genetic loading for IC was associated with higher IC scores. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study provides comprehensive evidence on the genetic architecture of IC, identifying novel genetic variants and biological pathways, advancing our current knowledge and laying the foundation for ongoing and future research on healthy aging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".