MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415054187 · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2025.138852

A quantitative assessment of daily transportation energy demand and electrification potential across the dwelling types in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area

2025· article· en· W4415054187 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Sumaiya Afrose Suma, Melvyn Li, Felita Ong, Kaili Wang, Eleftheria Kontou, Khandker Nurul Habib

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransportation Planning and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsElectrificationVehicle miles of travelGreenhouse gasEnergy consumptionIncentiveConsumption (sociology)Fossil fuelPrivate transportElectricity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The urban passenger transportation sector is a major energy consumer in Canada, accounting for nearly 48% of transport-related energy use and is heavily reliant on fossil fuel-based vehicles. Electrifying private vehicles offers a promising solution to reduce fossil fuel consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, but its full potential remains underexplored. This study focuses on the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA). It examines how residential dwelling types influence daily household transportation energy demand, with a specific focus on electrification barriers in multi-unit residential buildings (MURBs). Using personal and household travel surveys, the study applies supervised machine learning models, such as Random Forest and Decision Tree models, to impute vehicle engine types and estimate daily transportation energy use. The results show significant variation in energy demand by dwelling type, with detached homes consuming the most, followed by MURBs and townhouses. Moreover, there is an increase in reliance on private vehicles and ridesharing post-pandemic. Scenario analysis reveals that a complete transition to electric vehicles (EVs) has the potential to reduce daily household private vehicle energy consumption by up to 77.3%. The reductions vary by dwelling type, with detached homes projected to achieve a 54.4% decrease, while MURBs are expected to see a 14.8% reduction. Peak hour charging demand in 100% EV scenarios would reach 6640 GJ for houses and 1792 GJ for MURBs. These findings underscore the need for targeted policies to promote EV adoption, particularly for MURBs, and tailored incentives for households with detached homes. • Transportation energy demand varies by dwelling type, with detached homes highest. • Daily energy demand for private vehicles and ridesharing increased post-pandemic. • 100% EVs can reduce daily private vehicle energy consumption by 77.3%. • Detached homes may achieve a 54.4% reduction in energy demand, MURBs 14.8%. • Peak hour charging demand: 6640 GJ for detached homes, 1792 GJ for MURBs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergySame topicTransportation Planning and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207