MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415119457 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2025.10452

Mortality in Children with Optic Nerve Hypoplasia/Septo-Optic-Pituitary Dysplasia

2025· article· en· W4415119457 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Michael S. Salman, Chelsea Ruth, Marina Yogendran, Lisa M. Lix

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDysplasiaOptic nerveDiseaseComorbidityMortality rateIncidence (geometry)Lifetime riskEpidemiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIM: To quantify optic nerve hypoplasia/septo-optic-pituitary dysplasia (ONH/SOD) all-cause mortality rate and risk of death in Manitoba, Canada. METHOD: A retrospective population-based study with a case-control design was undertaken using the Manitoba Population Research Data Repository. Cases were 124 ONH/SOD patients diagnosed during 1990-2019, matched to 620 unrelated population-based controls on year of birth, sex and area of residence. Both cases and controls were followed until March 31, 2022, or until they moved out of the province or died. Crude mortality rate was estimated. Cox proportional hazards models were used to test for differences in all-cause mortality between cases and controls. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. RESULTS: percentiles) age of death of ONH/SOD patients was 4.6 (2.7-9.1) years. The median duration of follow-up was 12.0 years for the cases and 11.4 years for the controls. The crude mortality rate (95% CIs) was 3.7 (1.7-8.3) per 1000 person-years in patients with ONH/SOD and 1.0 (0.5-2.1) per 1000 person-years in unrelated matched controls. All-cause mortality was significantly higher in ONH/SOD patients compared to unrelated controls (HR = 3.7, 95% CI = 1.3-10.5). CONCLUSION: Patients with ONH/SOD have a higher risk of death compared to unrelated controls. Healthcare professionals should be familiar with the morbidities and comorbidities associated with ONH/SOD and the complications that may lead to their demise, since they can be managed to reduce the mortality risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors→French-language works237,207→